AP has Kansas back ahead of ISU lol

What worries me more is getting a nice seed, then getting a team like Kentucky in a potential second round matchup. We're always going to be fighting the "clowns" for respect until we sustain an extended period of success. And even then...

This is why we need to avoid the East bracket and secure an Omaha/MW region path.
 
Crazy that ISU's lowest rated pollster last week was Nick Alvarez at 14 (lol). This week he jumped them all the way up to 5th and the actual rank dropped.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Marcelason78
This time of year it seems the AP and Coaches polls start to become more like the college football playoff poll. Certain teams will be placed at certain spots to meet the needs of the networks, site locations, conference bias etc........

I think I'm going to stick more to Net, BPI and KenPom.
The AP poll and Coaches poll have no bearing on the NCAA tournament selection. NONE
 
We all know what's going to happen. We are going to win out with a 14-4 record in the B12 end up 2nd in conference.

KU and Marquette will get the 2/3 in Omaha while they ship us to the East as a 2. Baylor gets Memphis as a 3. Their reasoning will be is they "rewarded" us with a 2 seed.

Insert sad failure sound.

If Iowa State is a 2 seed they would get Omaha, not Marquette.
 
Football logic says an early loss is more tolerable than a late season one. We dropped our non-con games to VT and TAMU as this team was gelling in early season. I’d love another shot at both of those teams.

Regardless of rankings, I put more stock in our XII performance (recency) than our non-con resume.
Exactly. Lots of variability in early season games, especially depending on how many players are returning on each team, etc.

A team full of newcomers will be way more vulnerable early than a team with a lot returning, so which is the better judgement of quality, early or later games? Clearly it's later games.
 
Exactly. Lots of variability in early season games, especially depending on how many players are returning on each team, etc.

A team full of newcomers will be way more vulnerable early than a team with a lot returning, so which is the better judgement of quality, early or later games? Clearly it's later games.

Whichever ones we're winning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclonepride
Win out. Win a couple (or more) in the Big 12 Tourney. Get the #2 seed. Actually play like a #2 seed in the NCAA. All else doesn't matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nrg4isu
The AP poll and Coaches poll have no bearing on the NCAA tournament selection. NONE
I would say you don't know that for certain. At the end of the day the slection and seeding is done through a series of ballots, and you never know what may influence individual votes. You hope they don't let AP and Coaches poll influence them but you never know.
 
The Righteous Order Disturbed

Gather round, my fellow fanatics, and brace yourself for a tale of epic proportions, where the impossible teeters on the brink of reality and all that is good clashes with evil incarnate.

In the age-old annals of collegiate athletics, there lies a tale so deeply entrenched in the lore of the sport that it scarcely dares whisper its name in the hallowed halls of the Associated Press. Herein, we delve into the enigmatic wisdom of the AP voters, those sage soothsayers whose foresight pierces beyond the veil of mere mortal comprehension, guiding the fates of teams with the inscrutable wisdom of the ancients.

It is said, in tones both hushed and reverent, that these venerable chroniclers harbor secrets of a covenant old as the game itself—a sacred pact with the guardians of the sport, decreeing that the storied bluebloods of Kansas, Kentucky, Duke, and North Carolina must ever reign supreme in the celestial rankings, lest balance be undone.

Yet, in the year of our lord two thousand and twenty-four, a prophecy whispered through the corridors of Iowa State University Athletics—a prophecy so bold, so blasphemous, that it dared imagine a world where the Cyclones ascended beyond the bluebloods in the hallowed AP polls. Such a world, the sages warned, would herald an era of upheaval unimagined, a cataclysm so dire that the very fabric of college basketball would tremble at its core.

For should the Cyclones usurp the ordained order, breaking the unspoken decree and ranking ahead of the sacred four, the heavens themselves would darken. A chill would sweep across the hardwood, as if the ghosts of games past had returned to bear witness to the unfathomable. In this moment of sacrilege, the very essence of the sport would warp, heralding the arrival of the four horsemen of the basketball apocalypse—Dunk, Defense, Dribble, and Despair.

Dunk, the first horseman, would shatter rims with thunderous ferocity, his dunks echoing through eternity, heralding the end of days. Following him, Defense, whose shadow would suffocate the light of hope, rendering the offense of adversaries as futile whispers in the dark. Dribble, with the ball chained to his ethereal form, would weave through the court unchallenged, mocking the laws of physics and man. Lastly, Despair would ride, trailing his brethren, ensnaring the hearts of fans and foes alike in a web of unending sorrow.

And as these heralds of doom galloped across the scorched earth of this new world, a fiery maelstrom would engulf the realm. Courts would crack and splinter, consumed by the infernal rage of a game unrecognizable. The skies would bleed cardinal, as if the very essence of competition itself had been set ablaze. From this conflagration, a new order would emerge, born not of tradition and respect, but of chaos and the ashes of the old world.

Tales would speak of the day the Cyclones dared to dream, a cautionary saga woven into the fabric of the sport, a reminder of the fragile balance that once was. Elders would recount the tale in hushed tones, their words a somber elegy to the beauty and tragedy of ambition unchecked.

Yet, in the heart of every Cyclone, a spark of rebellion would endure. For though the world might crumble and the heavens fall, the spirit of competition, of challenging the impossible, burns eternal. In this apocalyptic vision, a truth is revealed—not of rankings and titles, but of the unyielding courage to dream, to defy the ordained order in pursuit of greatness.

So let this ancient tome serve not as a warning, but as a testament to the indomitable will of those who dare to imagine a world transformed. For in the end, it is not the rankings that define us, but the journey, the battles fought on the court and in the hearts of those who believe in the impossible.

Thus concludes our tale, a narrative etched in the annals of Iowa State lore, a story of ambition, apocalypse, and the audacious dream of a ranking unbound by the chains of tradition. Let it be known that on the day the Cyclones ascend, the world may tremble, but their spirit shall soar, undaunted by the specter of doom, forever chasing the glory of the game.
 
The AP poll and Coaches poll have no bearing on the NCAA tournament selection. NONE
Yeah, you are right, to a point.

But the committee that pick the teams do see them so they have a way of swaying their opinions. Just like ESPNs constant love fest for the SEC sways peoples opinions.

In the end it has no bearing, but it does have a bearing on peoples mindset about the top teams.

And as I said, when reporters....are predicting the Tournament Bracket, its hard for them to justify putting Kansas at 2 and ISU at 3 when they have ISU ranked ahead on their poll.

ie. like I said, they have to justify, picking KU ahead of ISU on their tourney predictions.
 
Not for some... Look at Arizona. They've been swept by one of the better teams in the conference and they also own losses to Stanford and Oregon State. Those two terrible losses should absolutely matter, especially in a weak AF Pac 12.
Arizona is a head scratcher. They aren’t even top ten.
 
El Paso journalist Bret Bloomquist put 14-14 ASU on his ballot at 9th. They need to rescind his voting rights right now. Not a single other voter ranked them.
That's a weird selection.

Based on his previous ballot, he almost had to have submitted something incorrectly.

Week 16 he had Arizona #3, Washington State #20 and ASU unranked.

Week 17 it's Arizona #6, WSU #21 and ASU at 9.

So the crossover of Wazzu-over-Zona then losing at Arizona State doesn't explain it.

I don't know how AP voting is submitted anymore, if something could go haywire digitally, or if there's some kind of verification element.

There's also a possibility he doesn't know what he's doing. :)
 
Yeah, you are right, to a point.

But the committee that pick the teams do see them so they have a way of swaying their opinions. Just like ESPNs constant love fest for the SEC sways peoples opinions.

In the end it has no bearing, but it does have a bearing on peoples mindset about the top teams.

And as I said, when reporters....are predicting the Tournament Bracket, its hard for them to justify putting Kansas at 2 and ISU at 3 when they have ISU ranked ahead on their poll.

ie. like I said, they have to justify, picking KU ahead of ISU on their tourney predictions.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron