Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just seems like the kind of thing someone needs to get in trouble for. I'm sure it was an accident, but you can't be that careless with a firearm and get away with it.
Just seems like the kind of thing someone needs to get in trouble for. I'm sure it was an accident, but you can't be that careless with a firearm and get away with it.
You mean like the person who prepares the props?
I'm not suggesting they should escape liability either. I hope they get indicted as well. But I also can understand the thought behind it being the resposibility of the person with the weapon to use it safely, even if you are in a movie. I don't know why that would absolve you of the same liability you'd have when not on a movie set.
I'm sure this thread won't turn political.![]()
The person that should be (and has been) in trouble for it is the armorer on set who was responsible for the safety of weapons on set.
Just remember, an indictment is not a conviction.
I disagree because if I am an ACTOR why should I even have to question if a prop gun I am using in a scene is live. It should NEVER be live.
It's probably more that he is a producer on the film.I disagree because if I am an ACTOR why should I even have to question if a prop gun I am using in a scene is live. It should NEVER be live.
I'm not suggesting they should escape liability either. I hope they get indicted as well. But I also can understand the thought behind it being the resposibility of the person with the weapon to use it safely, even if you are in a movie. I don't know why that would absolve you of the same liability you'd have when not on a movie set.
Yeah, grand jury doesnt determine guilt, just probable cause. Long ways to go before he is actually convicted of something. I think this will be a tough case for the prosecutors.I imagine Baldwin wins this case at trial