Shouldn't JP "focus" on all fans? This guy is a fan of ISU. He may not be a donor, but since when is ISU in a position to turn off any fans? Does ISU have such a dirth of fans that Jamie can risk offending ANY potential fan, just because the guy is not a season-ticket holder or donor? This guy is a potential season-ticket purchaser, or future donor.......wouldn't it be smarter on JP's part to cultivate that potential rather than totally turn the guy off to the program?
To me this was extremely unprofessional, and arrogant on JP's part. He checks some lists and comes to the conclusion guy is not a donor or season-ticket holder. Fine. So that somehow makes him less of a fan? What does ISU have more of...fans who are season-ticket holders or donors, or just fans period? Truth is, JP had no idea what level of support this man (or his family or company) may have given in the past. Yet, he has the balls to tell him that his email should be embarrassing to him?
This is disappointing to me if JP indeed wrote this response. What is even more disappointing though is the reaction of so many on here supporting JP putting down a fellow Cyclone fan, and potential season-ticket buyer or future donor. What if in the next 20 years, this guy becomes a millionaire, or his kids do? Do you think donations will be forthcoming from him then?
I worked for the University for years. In my position, I had to deal with disgruntled patrons on a daily basis. I know that if I ever treated any of those patrons in the manner that JP treated this Cyclone fan, I would not have had my job for long.
For all of you supporting JP on this......keep this in mind......if you are not a donor, or season-ticket holder, the way JP thinks of the man who wrote the email, is exactly the same way he thinks of you.[/QUOTE]
I don't believe that is true. Don't you think that the tenor of the original email contributes to what JP thinks of the author? I'm sure when I emailed JP he looked up that I have only purchased cheap season tickets without a donation for the last few years but he still treated me as though my opinions mattered. It was not one of those "I'll take it under advisement" responses, either. I was honestly impressed.
I am confident if the email was negative yet respectful there would have been a much different response.
I am not going to comment further on the response the email did get.