A historical chart I made
- Thread starter Socalclone1
- Start date
Re: An historical chart I made
Like where we will be in two year?
It's been some time since I last took a stat class, but that trend is not something that is fun to look at toward the end of that graph
Like where we will be in two year?
Re: An historical chart I made
Of the 5 worst conference records in the last 30 years, McD has 60% of them in 13.3% of the time. Does anyone need to see anything else?
Of the 5 worst conference records in the last 30 years, McD has 60% of them in 13.3% of the time. Does anyone need to see anything else?
Re: An historical chart I made
the 7 winning seasons in 30 years has been posted dozens of times...but that is a nice way of putting it in a chart.
the 7 winning seasons in 30 years has been posted dozens of times...but that is a nice way of putting it in a chart.
Re: An historical chart I made
I'm the same...don't like seeing it. So I became the Grammer police in this thread, when I'm probably the least likely to ever have good Grammer in most of my posts.
I'm the same...don't like seeing it. So I became the Grammer police in this thread, when I'm probably the least likely to ever have good Grammer in most of my posts.
To the people saying "this proves we aren't elite"
Some people are using this data as an opportunity to say it proves we were never elite -- as if that somehow means we have no right to demand excellence, but that's a debate for another day.
I don't think anyone, myself included, is saying we are a historically elite basketball program. We have experienced some level of success, which proves the right person can be successful here and, therefore, we as fans have the right to aspire to that success. I think we have experienced enough success that we should always be able to expect that we will field a competitive team, at the very least. We are not doing that now and even if we are not, or never were, elite, that does not preclude us from demanding more than we're getting from this program.
End of rant.
Some people are using this data as an opportunity to say it proves we were never elite -- as if that somehow means we have no right to demand excellence, but that's a debate for another day.
I don't think anyone, myself included, is saying we are a historically elite basketball program. We have experienced some level of success, which proves the right person can be successful here and, therefore, we as fans have the right to aspire to that success. I think we have experienced enough success that we should always be able to expect that we will field a competitive team, at the very least. We are not doing that now and even if we are not, or never were, elite, that does not preclude us from demanding more than we're getting from this program.
End of rant.
Here’s what I see when I review this data. From 1980 – 2005, ISU MBB winning % was very cyclical. We would experience a few years of increasing success which would then be followed by a “rebuilding yearâ€, then a few more years of increasing success, and then another “rebuilding yearâ€, etc….. 80-81, 86-87, 89-90, 93-94, 97-98, and 01-02 being our “rebuilding yearsâ€. I have updated the chart to highlight this.
Two big things that stand out:
1. This cyclical trend crosses over coaches. That is, coaching changes seem to have no affect on the cycle.
2. The cycle was broken in 05-06 and a new trend has begun.
Two big things that stand out:
1. This cyclical trend crosses over coaches. That is, coaching changes seem to have no affect on the cycle.
2. The cycle was broken in 05-06 and a new trend has begun.