. Of his (few) picks, only 2 stand out as truly bad plays (long throws that were late giving the DB time to jump the route).
If your not sure if he's the future of the offense, I'm not sure what would have you convinced.
I agree with everything you said except for this. More of his picks were on him than two and more than 2 were bad decisions. Most of them were bad decisions. Hence why they are picks. All of the pick 6's were partly or essentially all on him. Norton's route was bad but it was not a great throw or decision. Worst of all, that whole damn drive and game to that point I kept thinking - stop with those routes. Iowa is going to sit on it. Iowa is going to sit on it. Iowa is going to - oh sh*t.
Now he is 10 million times an upgrade over Dekkers.
He has a good, sweet release, and has a pretty good understanding of defense and timing - some of which you'd expect from a coaches son, let alone a coaches son who was a pretty darn good NFL player for a long time.
His arm strength is average to maybe a little above average.
The one thing he needs to improve on - or the biggest area - and this is every QB, not just him - is understanding more of the hot reads. There are times he's done great, but there's been times, especially on the middle pressures, where he seems to not recognize it quite as well -
but that is hardly an indictment on him, because there are NFL quarterbacks who struggle with some of the middle pressures and hot reads. Edge ones are relatively easier - and yes, also, some of the identification of hots in the middle is not just on the QB. Bonfias (or the center, or maybe it was Hufford since his experience) can also help identifying some of the middle hots.
Long story short, he's a ten million upgrade over Dekkers, its clearly his job.