Wow, Kirk is a little man. He doesn’t like rules that don’t favor him. He isn’t complaining about the extra 12 seconds against Nebraska
F*CK IOWA
- Thread starter FallOf81
- Start date
Wow, Kirk is a little man. He doesn’t like rules that don’t favor him. He isn’t complaining about the extra 12 seconds against Nebraska
Remember,he was complaining about his fullback fumbling against us for a few weeks. Said that’s a TD where he’s from. Although every angle showed it out before crossing. Kirk is a bitter old man now.
Really? Can you give us an example of an Iowa State head coach complaining in a press conference immediately following a game about a correctly officiated play that occurred a month earlier? I want to check it out.
Probably still whining about it because the loss cost his son his job.
No. Sucking at his job year after year after year cost his son his job. Any other rational program would have made that change a long time ago.
You won’t.
It’s really unbecoming of Kirk. Such a b**** to still be whining like that.
The truth, Kirk (that everyone outside of suckeye orbit understands), is you play an absolute dogsh*t schedule. Your D coordinator certainly has put together a unit and a scheme that stymies mediocre teams. Your best win of the season (against an extremely mediocre - at best - Iowa State team); yep, your D controlled us.
Take joy and embrace the dogsh*t schedule and give thanks this holiday season that you get to play it! A guaranteed 8 win season and with a little luck, a cake walk to a 10 win season! Embrace being lucky as literal f***! I’m certainly jealous.
It wont matter either way. OSU is #1 in the country in defense ScUM is 2. OSU has Harrision Jr, ScUM has JJ and Corum. Both teams will annihilate Iowa.
I don’t expect to change any rival fans minds, most of you are incapable but “correct” call in this case is completely in the eye of the beholder.
It was a 100% judgement call. I believe that it’s still a requirement for irrefutable evidence to overturn a call. There wasn’t irrefutable evidence here. They didn’t even go to review that element of the play. Not a single player let up. Not a whistle half heartedly blow or flag thrown. The office even said the best “evidence” they have is the overhead camera. Were some of the Minnesota players playing 500 feet above the field that would make them believe a fair catch that a fair catch had been signaled? Why would someone even attempt a fair catch signal (invalid or otherwise) on a ball that bounced 50 feet away?
What I do find comical as it relates to this site is I know I’d expect both fan bases to respond in kind if the situation were reciprocal.
I do find it odd that Kirk still brought it up again but I think that tells you how dumb of an overturn it was, how increasingly snarky he’s become the last few years, and yes an element that it led to the mid season dismissal of his son.
Haydenism on full throttle.
It wasn't an overturn. There was no call.
Every scoring play is reviewed and they caught something that a player can't do and made the correct call. You can't ******* wave an arm while fielding a punt and return it. As fundamentally sound as Iowa is, they should know this.
The timing was terrible but the bigger question is how that was the difference in a game against a marginal Minnesota team.
I would hope if Iowa were 11-1 and somehow pulled it off next week that the CFP committee would have enough sense to pick other one loss teams that actually had to do something all season except for one game where Michigan or Ohio State totally ****ed up.
You still think that call against Minnesota was a judgement call? OMG you are a typical idiot Iowa fan! LOL!!
There absolutely was a call. The call was touchdown on the field. Thats not debatable. Lol
I don’t disagree with you that they shouldn’t have even been in that position though. Minnesota is not good.
Last edited:
Like I said, some of you are incapable. It was literally a national discussion as to whether it was or wasn’t an invalid signal.
Yes, a scoring call, which they review.
This is nothing more than something Iowa fans will stick with forever because they're convinced they had a really good team this year and are robbed of another national title.
Every scoring play is reviewed; all components of the play are reviewed.
Look at it from Minnesota’s perspective: the officials should had called leaping, giving Minnesota a first down. Then the punt returner waves his arms, which is an invalid fair catch. Both of these components to the play would negate anything that happens afterwards.
If Minnesota was the punt team on this play, and Iowa was kicking, Iowa fans would be saying this was the proper call and we wouldn’t hear anything from Kirk.
In the end, the PROPER CALL WAS ULTIMATELY MADE. That’s all that matters
It was the definition of an invalid fair catch signal. I have no idea why this is still a thing. It wasn’t a judgement call and the fact Kirk or his special teams coach don’t understand the rule is not something I would keep pointing out if I were them haha.
I am incapable of understanding what idiot Iowa fans don't understand about the rule. Are you talking about the national conversation with all of the NCAA officials who said it was the correct call or from the idiot youtube pundits who don't understand the rule any better than you?
Lol no. They have good team that’s going to get boat raced next week.