Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think the people have seen MN players "pull up" right when Cooper starts waving. Not when he goes and grabs the ball. Meaning they were not in position or were caught off guard when he did actually grab the ball, believing a fair catch may have been called.I didn't watch the IA / MN game and honestly, I hadn't pulled up video of the play until now. It was enough to enjoy Iowa fans losing their minds, but reading thru the arguments in this thread piqued my curiosity. I just watched the ESPN video, which includes close-up of CD's motions beginning at about the 30 second mark:
![]()
Invalid fair catch wipes away Iowa TD in loss
During a 12-10 loss at home, officials wiped out Cooper DeJean's punt-return touchdown that would have given Iowa a late fourth-quarter lead against Minnesota because DeJean gave an invalid fair catch signal by waving his left arm.www.espn.com
I understand the rule and agree it was properly applied by the officiating crew. Period - end of story.
Having said that, the agony of defeat would be difficult to accept. He's clearly telling his teammates to get away, as evidenced by the player who peels off - I don't see any attempt to deceive. Without going into minutiae, it simply doesn't strike me as a "fair catch" signal (I know, I know) and I don't see any Gophers pulling up - how #'s 37 & 24 missed him on the sideline is a mystery! He makes a clutch play and a great return in a deciding moment of the game. As much as I hate Hawk fans, and I live in Iowa City so my disdain is significant, I understand their angst.
I can both hate EIU and admire Cooper DeJean's prowess on the football field. My interpretation finds him guilty of overexuberance and an unfortunate hand gesture. It has to be a bitter pill for EIU fans to swallow and I find myself in the unusual position of having empathy for them. I don't like the feeling but it will soon pass.
If. You. Wave. Off. Your. Teammates. You. Cannot. Return. The. Punt.This almost comes across as a rhetorical question that basically answers itself. If you ask every football fan "do you see players waive off teammates and know what that looks like" every ******* one will say yes and replicate the exact some motion you saw from DeJean. I also am willing to bet, in a decisive landslide, that most fans think (at this point) it's part of the general game. So if we see it routinely, rarely see confusion or issues when the waive offs occur, why is this so ******* hard to grasp?
There's my rub. So many people are here trying to justify a rule that serves no real purpose, if people are being honest. Yet these same people are minimizing plays that occur much more frequently (waive offs) and a plays that are easily acceptable/recognizable from players, coaches, and fans.
It's really not ******* hard, folks.
1. Just because I’m late arriving to the car accident doesn’t mean I won’t slow down and take a look for myself.2 things:
1. Holy crap, we are still discussing this arm waving debate?
2. After all the cheap ways that program has won the past 10 years with crap opponents and flukes that always bounce their way they deserve ZERO sympathy.
Exactly how I feel. You summed it up perfectly.I didn't watch the IA / MN game and honestly, I hadn't pulled up video of the play until now. It was enough to enjoy Iowa fans losing their minds, but reading thru the arguments in this thread piqued my curiosity. I just watched the ESPN video, which includes close-up of CD's motions beginning at about the 30 second mark:
![]()
Invalid fair catch wipes away Iowa TD in loss
During a 12-10 loss at home, officials wiped out Cooper DeJean's punt-return touchdown that would have given Iowa a late fourth-quarter lead against Minnesota because DeJean gave an invalid fair catch signal by waving his left arm.www.espn.com
I understand the rule and agree it was properly applied by the officiating crew. Period - end of story.
Having said that, the agony of defeat would be difficult to accept. He's clearly telling his teammates to get away, as evidenced by the player who peels off - I don't see any attempt to deceive. Without going into minutiae, it simply doesn't strike me as a "fair catch" signal (I know, I know) and I don't see any Gophers pulling up - how #'s 37 & 24 missed him on the sideline is a mystery! He makes a clutch play and a great return in a deciding moment of the game. As much as I hate Hawk fans, and I live in Iowa City so my disdain is significant, I understand their angst.
I can both hate EIU and admire Cooper DeJean's prowess on the football field. My interpretation finds him guilty of overexuberance and an unfortunate hand gesture. It has to be a bitter pill for EIU fans to swallow and I find myself in the unusual position of having empathy for them. I don't like the feeling but it will soon pass.
The motion was deliberate. That can't be disputed. Whether or not it was done to deceive the Gophers is completely irrelevant.I was just trying to dispute another poster that said Cooper did it on purpose to deceive the Gophers. I don't think that was his intent at all and as stated it doesn't matter in this instance if it broke rules the or not.
How many people knew about this rule before Saturday? Because I certainly did not and I watch a lot of football.
Or was this when the contractors asked to get paid?
Or was this when the contractors asked to get paid?
I always thought 'peter' was a random word to pick for the situation; is it because it doesn't sound like anything else being yelled?
You might be right though I think it's pretty inconsistent maybe it's 30 percent of time they don't but that's why most weren't sure of the rule before this weekend. I do think having it taken place in this manner is going to clear it up going forward. You can about assume the leaders of the officials will be showing this play.No you dont, you see players waving, but not advancing the ball.
I hedge to guess most of the time when it happens it gets called. It just doesnt happen that often.
Players wave and never touch the ball, or they wave and call fair catch, 99% of the time.
And then I would say in the rare occasion a player waves, and try to advance it, it usually is called, at least more times than not.
saying otherwise is just guessing to try to prove your point with no real facts or data.
As far as I have seen there is only 1 real example of it not being called, and I didnt watch the game to see exactly how the play happened or how it was actually called.
We explained it to our players as another man's unit and you don't want to touch it.I always thought 'peter' was a random word to pick for the situation; is it because it doesn't sound like anything else being yelled?
If that's your opinion then I respect it but we're fundamentally opposites. I don't like too much officiating and I would of deemed a penalty in that game as doing too much. It's similar in basketball in that I don't need them going to monitor every time to get call right.Yes, that should had been a penalty as the rule at the time stated a runner could not be pushed from behind (or something to that effect). The difference is that play was not reviewable, so the officials on the field had to make the decision. And there was only 1 or two officials who had a view of the push to make the call. They decided not to make the penalty call. Video evidence clearly shows otherwise. Hence why many college football fans feel that play should had been penalized and why that play is still talked about today.
The difference with the Iowa play is the correct call was made.
You might be right though I think it's pretty inconsistent maybe it's 30 percent of time they don't but that's why most weren't sure of the rule before this weekend. I do think having it taken place in this manner is going to clear it up going forward. You can about assume the leaders of the officials will be showing this play.
If that's your opinion then I respect it but we're fundamentally opposites. I don't like too much officiating and I would of deemed a penalty in that game as doing too much. It's similar in basketball in that I don't need them going to monitor every time to get call right.
But you do realize every scoring play in football is reviewed, right?If that's your opinion then I respect it but we're fundamentally opposites. I don't like too much officiating and I would of deemed a penalty in that game as doing too much. It's similar in basketball in that I don't need them going to monitor every time to get call right.