CW constantly panders to hok fans because of Iowa everywhere.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CW constantly panders to hok fans because of Iowa everywhere.
How is the ball hitting the ground along a sideline "kicking to him"It made me so happy seeing that call. Also shows how bad the big 10 west is when even Fleck was dumb enough to blow that game by kicking to him in the first place after poor play calling almost the entire game
It's reviewable by multiple criteria.Alarson, you dumbed my response. What part is dumb? What part of that play is reviewable under the rulebook?
Do you think they should review things not allowed to be reviewed?
Alarson, you dumbed my response. What part is dumb? What part of that play is reviewable under the rulebook?
Do you think they should review things not allowed to be reviewed?
It seems like under review is the best application of the rule rather than blowing it dead and then realizing it was not an invalid signal. Here is the referee statement.Did they explain why it was reviewable? I didn't hear that part. I heard why it was the right call at the time... but not when it was missed.
Iowa doesn't have a legitimate complaint on the review. The review is going to include the entire play which clearly shows the invalid fair catch arm waving. That negates any advancement just as it would if the review showed the runner out of bounds or something like a knee contacting the ground. Not a penalty, but no advancement is permitted. Kirk is probably more upset that losing the special team score makes it harder for Brian to reach his scoring quota,It was reviewed to see if he stayed in bounds.
Best response. Thank youThe problem comes from that list being 'reviewable fouls'. A foul was not assessed.
This call being flipped is more akin to the booth noticing that a knee was down when the refs on the field didn't see it.
Thank you. I was definitely wrong in my analysis.It seems like under review is the best application of the rule rather than blowing it dead and then realizing it was not an invalid signal. Here is the referee statement.
"The receiver makes a pointing gesture with his right hand and he makes multiple wave gestures with his left hand," referee Tim O'Dey told a pool reporter. "That waving motion of the left hand constitutes an invalid fair-catch signal, so then when the receiving team recovers the ball, by rule, it becomes dead. That is a reviewable element of the game. We let the play run out and then we went to review. Review shows with indisputable video evidence that there is a waving motion with the left hand.
"That's when these rules are applied."
O'Dey said that while returners are allowed to point toward the ball, "any waving motion" renders the play dead. O'Dey consulted with the on-site replay official and collaborative reply, used by power conferences and headquartered in Pittsburgh, to make the ruling.
All scores are reviewedI hate iowa... but from c willy's analysis looks like they should not have been able to review that play when it wasn't called on the field
The attention is obviously on Iowa and whether they got screwed, but if I were a Minnesota fan, and it didn’t go the way it did, I would have been unbelievably mad. You can see a couple of their guys slow up when DeJean is waving. If you allow him to wave like that, that just encourages players to try to toe the line of what is and isn’t a fair catch (to basically throw the other team off and cheat). This may have just been an innocent mistake, but it had to be called the way it was.It seems like under review is the best application of the rule rather than blowing it dead and then realizing it was not an invalid signal. Here is the referee statement.
"The receiver makes a pointing gesture with his right hand and he makes multiple wave gestures with his left hand," referee Tim O'Dey told a pool reporter. "That waving motion of the left hand constitutes an invalid fair-catch signal, so then when the receiving team recovers the ball, by rule, it becomes dead. That is a reviewable element of the game. We let the play run out and then we went to review. Review shows with indisputable video evidence that there is a waving motion with the left hand.
"That's when these rules are applied."
O'Dey said that while returners are allowed to point toward the ball, "any waving motion" renders the play dead. O'Dey consulted with the on-site replay official and collaborative reply, used by power conferences and headquartered in Pittsburgh, to make the ruling.
And all aspects of the scoring play is reviewable.All scores are reviewed
I think also all plays in the last 2 minutes.All scores are reviewed
Since when do officials get interviewed about crucial calls? I'm stunned this actually took place.Have you listened to the interview with the officials after the game. They clearly explained the rules.