Absolutely. We never cut a kid but we had to cut a few families over the years.I coach my sons USSSA team. Finding families (not just players) that are good fits for your team is crucial.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Absolutely. We never cut a kid but we had to cut a few families over the years.I coach my sons USSSA team. Finding families (not just players) that are good fits for your team is crucial.
I don't know if USSSA has killed participation but it's definitely changed the demographics of who's playing baseball. Baseball was already an expensive sport compared to Football or Basketball adding in the club fees hasn't really helped with that. What we've got now is a group of more affluent, mostly white kids playing with private coaches and the like. What ends up happening is those more affluent suburban school have 100 kids show up for Freshman baseball when 10-12 ever end up playing so if you're not one of those 10 kids who play you go find another travel team. We don't see this so much in Iowa since the high school season overlaps with most travel ball in the summer but it's a real thing. The club sports model has taken over baseball from being a school sport.
Pretty good company.If it was another "short guy" like Drew Brees where would the pundits be ranking Purdy (Brees) based upon performance through four games?
My guess is it would be Allen, Mahomes, Tua, Purdy (Brees)
Absolutely. We never cut a kid but we had to cut a few families over the years.
Guess you didn't appreciate the Beatles and Timothy Leary either. Yeah I thought they were an awful band, worse after Lennon's JC comments in "66.Certainly not. I think Mama Purdy might have a few words with him if he started tanning his perineum, raving about Ayahuasca, and going on four day darkness retreats.
In Iowa in the DSM burbs you either have to be an elite player or you basically quit. It's kind of the other problem. You have 70 kids go out as freshman then there are like 4 left by senior year because if you aren't part of the top guys you don't get much playing time or practice time and you fall further behind the top guys.
My middle kid joined a fairly chill club team - total cost including uniforms is going to be about 500.00. That sounds like a lot but Little League in Ankeny is 250.00. It's not a cheap sport at all.
Ankeny little league is garbage compared to the other community little leagues around the metro. I’ve coached little league the past 4 years and coach a USSSA team for our son and am not sure I want to deal with Ankeny little league moving forward.
Correct, KCCI could not have shown the 49's and Arizonia game today as both are in the NFC, which gives those rights to Fox. If it's an interleague game, then the home team determines if it's on CBS or Fox.
They changed it this offseason, here is an article explaining it, basically CBS has pledged to show AFC games and Fox NFC games but they can switch a few games.
![]()
NFL media rights refresher: What can viewers expect next season?
As the 2011 NFL media rights deals wind down, here is a refresher course on what is to come in the new deals that start next season.www.sportsmediawatch.com
Interesting, explaining the new NFL media rights contract. The "flexing" is new and should provide better matchups for the TV viewers. Good for the NFL.
Thanks for the article!
With the new rules, could a CBS network (KCCI) have opted to show the 49ers vs AZ game if they wanted to, according to the new 'flex' policy?I know this has been addressed already, and the old rules of which games go on which networks no longer apply, but I just wanted to point out that under the old setup (NFC on Fox, AFC on CBS; or going further back, NFC on CBS and AFC on NBC) for inter-conference games it was the visiting team that determined which network had it, not the home team.
Too easy. I'll hold on this one.Wait…….is this bad? Doesn’t everyone do it?
got my purdy niners shirt in the mail last week, wore it sunday and he goes 20/21. dont think that coincidental.
With 81 home games MLB has an attendance problem so they have to penalize fans with the TV blackouts. I’m sure they’ve analyzed it and the numbers support their strategy but long-term you wonder if it hurts the sport. Probably already has.
It’s killed the sport. Young kids just aren’t into baseball anymore because they can’t watch it.
MLB does seem to have a huge problem. If you can't interest the kids, at least the majority of them, your fans drop, both now and in the future.I don't know if USSSA has killed participation but it's definitely changed the demographics of who's playing baseball. Baseball was already an expensive sport compared to Football or Basketball adding in the club fees hasn't really helped with that. What we've got now is a group of more affluent, mostly white kids playing with private coaches and the like. What ends up happening is those more affluent suburban school have 100 kids show up for Freshman baseball when 10-12 ever end up playing so if you're not one of those 10 kids who play you go find another travel team. We don't see this so much in Iowa since the high school season overlaps with most travel ball in the summer but it's a real thing. The club sports model has taken over baseball from being a school sport.
Brock has come a long way from the clipboard backup some projected him to be.Pretty good company.
Well said! Just think of all the QB's on all of the NFL teams, most of whom are or were touted to be more successful than Brock. Then look at how they largely perform (or under perform) in comparison to Brock.A combination of three areas should be used to rank an athlete:
1. Physical skills or capabilities,
2. Sport/game knowledge, and
3. Leadership (which may also mean following or supporting someone else when necessary) skills.
Brock has always been off-the-charts with his leadership skills (which, btw, would be enough to make him moderately successful in any sport). He is clearly in the top rank for football knowledge (ability to recognize and read defenses, use his eyes to mis-direct opponents, play decoy to extend plays, etc.). Finally, although he may not be the biggest, or strongest, or fastest to ever play quarterback; he has sufficient physical capabilities to do what has to be done.
Unless and until opponents find a way to degrade him physically or come up with a series of brilliant defensive strategies (because it's unlikely that they will fool Brock twice), Brock is going to be around and be one of the top quarterbacks in the game.
McCaffrey is unreal. This run where he hurdled a tackle and barely broke stride is incredible. Admittedly it was a pathetic tackle attempt, but still an incredible play.20/21 passing, wow! I hadn't looked the game up yet. And McCaffrey! what a game.
McCaffrey is unreal. This run where he hurdled a tackle and barely broke stride is incredible. Admittedly it was a pathetic tackle attempt, but still an incredible play.
McCaffrey is unreal. This run where he hurdled a tackle and barely broke stride is incredible. Admittedly it was a pathetic tackle attempt, but still an incredible play.
FWIW, Montana's first Superbowl win in the 1981 season was with WRs Dwight Clark (10'th round pick) and Freddy Solomon, and RBs Earl Cooper and Ricky Patton. #2 in 1984 had Clark and Solomon with RBs Craig and Wendell Tyler.He's just lucky to have great players he can throw to. Never mind that Joe Montana had Hall of Famers Jerry Rice and Roger Craig.
I thought he did this brilliantly a couple times this weekend.A combination of three areas should be used to rank an athlete:
1. Physical skills or capabilities,
2. Sport/game knowledge, and
3. Leadership (which may also mean following or supporting someone else when necessary) skills.
Brock has always been off-the-charts with his leadership skills (which, btw, would be enough to make him moderately successful in any sport). He is clearly in the top rank for football knowledge (ability to recognize and read defenses, use his eyes to mis-direct opponents, play decoy to extend plays, etc.). Finally, although he may not be the biggest, or strongest, or fastest to ever play quarterback; he has sufficient physical capabilities to do what has to be done.
Unless and until opponents find a way to degrade him physically or come up with a series of brilliant defensive strategies (because it's unlikely that they will fool Brock twice), Brock is going to be around and be one of the top quarterbacks in the game.