Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

5-ND stays independent because NBC is going to give them Big Ten money and let them remain independent. There's a reason they hired NBC Sports' Chief Executive to replace Swarbrick.

If I were the Big 12, I make a big swing at Washington/Oregon. Even if you know their end goal is the Big Ten, you might as well be the ones to make money off of them while they're in limbo. Add Washington, Oregon, Colorado, Arizona, Arizona State and UConn and be done with it. If/when Washington and Oregon leave you still have a very solid 16 team league to fall back on.
This is what it all hinges on. ND is wanting $75 mill/year from NBC, that's quite a bump. If NBC gives it to them, there's no way ND joins a conference anytime soon unless their path to the CFP is blocked, which is doubtful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: agentbear
Cheer, cheer, for old Notre Dame... ND is the prize. B1G is probably on pause until they can get ND, and whatever package is required to get them is what they will do.

UW/UO don't do enough, but if those two plus Stanford got ND as a 4th? Done.
Need to wait for the ACC to disband? And maybe grab a couple of those to get ND? Done.
Some combination of both and go to 24 teams? Done.

I think B1G is pat at 16 until ND is on the table.
Mostly agree but there's no way the B1G gives ND any kind of partial membership deal like the ACC did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CascadeClone
i am looking forward to watching the Eastern Iowa Squirm once they have to play a tougher conference schedule again.

heard many of their fans say they are looking forward to because tired of hearing about how bad Big Ten West has been.

can't wait to hear how happy they are once reality hits and realize they aren't anywhere close to top of that conference.
Schedule tougher no doubt, but will be awesome to get to play everyone every two years.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1776
Schedule tougher no doubt, but will be awesome to get to play everyone every two years.

exactly what i'm talking about. we'll see how "awesome" it is playing everyone when you go back to winning on average 7-8 games a year.

it's astonishing how clueless most Iowa fans seem to be about how ridiculously lucky they've gotten for past decade with their schedule.

i know it's not their fault. similar to old Big 12 North.

but the lack of acknowledgement is the part that makes it annoying af.
 
I guess my question is how does the PAC Catch 22 have a resolution? The PAC cannot offer known content as they don't know if teams will leave, but on the other hand, apparently CU and UA won't decide until they see the numbers. So, how can the media members offer a new deal? I guess they can offer a deal assuming the 10 remaining schools stay together, but what if one or more leave? Could there be pre-negiotiated "de-escalators"? Certainly the media members are not providing an entire menu of alternatives that cover multiple different scenarios.
If one or more schools leave, the deal's off and it's back to the drawing board of the remainders. All the schools named signing will be a requirement for the deal to go into effect. I'd also think a GOR would be attached for the duration of the deal.

There's no way the PAC is negotiating any scenario other than the current 10 as-is or, at most, with a few additions. They're struggling to get one offer to bring to their members, I can't imagine them trying to negotiate a whole range of scenarios.
 
This is what it all hinges on. ND is wanting $75 mill/year from NBC, that's quite a bump. If NBC gives it to them, there's no way ND joins a conference anytime soon unless their path to the CFP is blocked, which is doubtful.
Agree. If NBC gives them $75M, ND is doing well will the other $10M they get from the ACC.

NBC is paying $350M annually for it's Big10 rights which includes around 15 Sat night football games, 8 football games on exclusively on Peacock, 30MBB and 30 WBB games.

It would seem like NBC paying $75M for around 7 ND football games is a good deal. Especially when ND games will be the lead in for their Big10 telecasts.
 


0c8f72c1-9091-43fe-89ea-1fe7c6d54fc5_text.gif
 
But wouldnt that mean the Pac would have to sell off the PACN, to equal the ACCN money? Also the ACCN is owned by ESPN, so isnt that money already figured into the ESPN $17M.

Honestly them Selling the PACN would be best considering they have been losing money and carriage/exposure on it. But they have been refusing to do so.
ACC and ESPN jointly own the ACCN, 50% split revenue. ACC homers wanting to get into Texas and West Coast for in-network carriage which is a higher fee to Comcast, Dish, YouTube tv, etc., thus more revenue.
 
But wouldnt that mean the Pac would have to sell off the PACN, to equal the ACCN money? Also the ACCN is owned by ESPN, so isnt that money already figured into the ESPN $17M.

Honestly them Selling the PACN would be best considering they have been losing money and carriage/exposure on it. But they have been refusing to do so.
The $17M is separate from the ACCN. Note sure about PACN but it's been a disaster. I imagine Apple will have the PACN do the heavy lifting in their media deal with Apple tv providing the broadcast.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron