Alas we've got another deadline:
I could crack a safe with my nipples right now. This is delightful.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Alas we've got another deadline:
We know Big12 has plenty of time to wait, but how soon does the Big12 need to know for scheduling in 2024? October? January? At some point, its' not that you won't get an invite, but that you have missed the window for 2024.
A few more years of traditions and rivalries vs significantly more money, exposure, and security. Hmmm....Tradition and rivalries, what we all say the new realignments have killed. We can't chastise them for holding onto what we wish the rest of us could have.
Josh Pate likes to say that "money is undefeated".A few more years of traditions and rivalries vs significantly more money, exposure, and security. Hmmm....
^^^^So Hot!^^^^I could crack a safe with my nipples right now. This is delightful.
Viewership for live events is dropping. Not as fast as other forms of entertainment but it is. I don’t think these deals get bigger in the future.The short deal expected is what will keep the Pac together. They are reasoning that the market forces won't be as bad when they do this again in 3-4 years.
Please tell me you’re a woman.I could crack a safe with my nipples right now. This is delightful.
This is one thing that I’ve noticed and it happens in the media and with posters on here. People just assume? think? are fed the line? that lawyers and consultants don’t **** up.
And will again.Remember that time when it looked like Iowa State’s best hope for survival might have been joining a few other Big XII refugees and hoping for a PAC invite? It wasn’t all that long ago … my, things sure do change
they 100% were told they would be offered a membership by now that never came.
It almost feels like the AZ AD is trying to layout multiple rationales for bailing. As if he has made up his mind but needs to have the "well, we said this was a must and they didn't deliver". No need to say it out loud in public if you just want GK to know what your MIRs are.
As far as Labor Day, how ridiculous. We know Big12 has plenty of time to wait, but how soon does the Big12 need to know for scheduling in 2024? October? January? At some point, its' not that you won't get an invite, but that you have missed the window for 2024. And now you're screwed, either stuck in the Pac or else playing a home-and-home-and-home-and-home-and-home-and-home-and-home-and-home with San Diego State.
We've joked maybe GK's strategy is to string everyone out until they have no other choices left, but if they are still effing around in ~November, wouldn't you have to just say "enough" and head to the Big12?
This is the key. Pac12 member schools financial meetings for the 24/25 budgets are probably already having preliminary discussions. The longer this drags out the more uncomfortable those internal meetings become and at some point someone in that room is going to suggest jumping to the Big12 so they have some kind of certainty in the numbers for the AD.This year's schedule wasn't released until January 31, 2023- so not much urgency on the Big12's side.
IMO Pac12 Presidents might feel some urgency in creating the fiscal 2024/25 budgets if they have to wait until September to know Pac12 media deal net revenue impact.
The detail gets lost when throwing out percentages like 80%. If the Pac 12 stays at 10 teams, that would mean 1 game a week is shown on linear TV and the other 4 on a streaming service. That has to be a scary thought for Pac12 football coaches.The streaming percentage will be interesting. I'd say Oregon might say if linear is above 25% they're good with it because they'll always be on linear. Oregon St. and WSU might be fine if it meant more money, because they probably aren't going to be on linear if it's anything less than 50%, outside of their in-state rivalry games.
I think the teams most concerned about that mix are going to be the likes of UW, Utah, and probably CU. CU probably thinks they could rack up some linear slots with the Sanders interest. Utah has been a good brand, but knows they are going usually lose out to OU in the TV pecking order, and if CU is even decent they'll get some of those slots, especially early in the year. I'd say that difference between 25 and 50% linear is going to cost Utah, UW and maybe CU along with any of the others that might have a better than expected season.
This is the key. Pac12 member schools financial meetings for the 24/25 budgets are probably already having preliminary discussions. The longer this drags out the more uncomfortable those internal meetings become and at some point someone in that room is going to suggest jumping to the Big12 so they have some kind of certainty in the numbers for the AD.
Without going into a lengthy explanation, this is why I think nobody jumps if they don’t do so before the deal is announced.This is the key. Pac12 member schools financial meetings for the 24/25 budgets are probably already having preliminary discussions. The longer this drags out the more uncomfortable those internal meetings become and at some point someone in that room is going to suggest jumping to the Big12 so they have some kind of certainty in the numbers for the AD.
Scheer had a tweet many months ago that someone in SDSU admin (might have been AD) was telling boosters at a swim event that they would be joining the PAC in a matter of weeks. Again this was months ago…they 100% were told they would be offered a membership by now that never came.
This year's schedule wasn't released until January 31, 2023- so not much urgency on the Big12's side.
IMO Pac12 Presidents might feel some urgency in creating the fiscal 2024/25 budgets if they have to wait until September to know Pac12 media deal net revenue impact.