I, too, enjoy splitting hairs on the internet.Isn't Civil either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I, too, enjoy splitting hairs on the internet.Isn't Civil either.
It's not, but it's a simple liberty. There's other things like if the owner isn't driving and has to go through the hassle when the ticket shows up in the mail. As mentioned I typically do 78 in 70s but on plenty of drives between KC and DSM when there's no traffic I'll bump that up to 83 or so. I don't see it any different than driving across South Dakota with the 80 limit as long as there isn't traffic around. Speed cameras don't do anything, officers patrolling at least make people pay attention/think about they're driving.
It's about our relationship with a parasitic entity. If there was no revenue in it, these wouldn't exist.The mental gymnastics just so someone doesn't have to drive like 3mph slower is wild.
You could just not speed, or run red lights, or park illegally and then the parasite gets nothing. They're pretty clear in what you shouldn't do, they put signs on the road every so often.It's about our relationship with a parasitic entity. If there was no revenue in it, these wouldn't exist.
You could just not speed, or run red lights, or park illegally and then the parasite gets nothing. They're pretty clear in what you shouldn't do, they put signs on the road every so often.
Yeah but the guy who has someone doing 90 in a 25 hit his kitchen during morning coffee should have chosen to live elsewhere.
Probably.
Or needed to diddle the Titanic because "I have the $$$$".Yeah but the guy who has someone doing 90 in a 25 hit his kitchen during morning coffee should have chosen to live elsewhere.
Probably.
Curious. Would you be OK with speed cameras if they also alerted police of a potential drunk or distracted driver? Or you got a ticket in the mail for phone in the hand while driving. I have seen some countries testing that concept out.Cameras don't catch drunks and distracted drivers, two things I believe to be way more dangerous. This is a straight up money grab. Don't civil infractions go to the municipality while criminal fines go to state?
Cameras are cheap. I would rather you were required to have a dashcam in your vehicle and every infraction be recorded with the caveat that the DRIVER is immediately notified of the infraction and the impending fine, not a postcard 2 weeks later saying mail your check to a PO box in AZ.Curious. Would you be OK with speed cameras if they also alerted police of a potential drunk or distracted driver? Or you got a ticket in the mail for phone in the hand while driving. I have seen some countries testing that concept out.
Knocking on wood... I haven't had a moving violation in 25 years.Curious. Would you be OK with speed cameras if they also alerted police of a potential drunk or distracted driver? Or you got a ticket in the mail for phone in the hand while driving. I have seen some countries testing that concept out.
Say somebody steals something from your porch and your doorbell camera clearly shows who did it. If that is the only proof you have do they get away with it because they can't "face their accuser"? Aren't you the accuser and just using video as a piece of evidence? How is that different from somebody watching a traffic video and issuing a ticket? Isn't that person the accuser and the video is just evidence?Otherwise it would violate the constitutional right to face your accuser
You’d rather dash cam in your car ticketing you instantly?Cameras are cheap. I would rather you were required to have a dashcam in your vehicle and every infraction be recorded with the caveat that the DRIVER is immediately notified of the infraction and the impending fine, not a postcard 2 weeks later saying mail your check to a PO box in AZ.
The curse of death!!Knocking on wood... I haven't had a moving violation in 25 years.
The curse of death!!
Not only speeding cameras but ones at intersections to fine you for making a turn on red. Daughter got one a couple months ago in DSM
Do speed cameras clearly identify who is actually driving?Say somebody steals something from your porch and your doorbell camera clearly shows who did it. If that is the only proof you have do they get away with it because they can't "face their accuser"? Aren't you the accuser and just using video as a piece of evidence? How is that different from somebody watching a traffic video and issuing a ticket? Isn't that person the accuser and the video is just evidence?
Do speed cameras clearly identify who is actually driving?
It has a far, far greater chance of accurately showing who is being filmed.Does a door camera?
Would the ticket in this case go to the owner of the porch since the porch is used during the commission of a crime? The owner of the porch is responsible for who uses their porch.Say somebody steals something from your porch and your doorbell camera clearly shows who did it. If that is the only proof you have do they get away with it because they can't "face their accuser"? Aren't you the accuser and just using video as a piece of evidence? How is that different from somebody watching a traffic video and issuing a ticket? Isn't that person the accuser and the video is just evidence?