Silicon Valley Bank / Rippling

My son works for a private equity firm that uses SVB good thing he got his bonus last week. His company is going to lose some (maybe a lot of) money.
 
sell-it-all-sell-it-all-today.gif
Great movie! The Big Short was good, but Margin Call was better. Just didn’t have as big of names involved.
 
This is how this becomes problematic.

"And many start-ups in Silicon Valley don’t generate revenue at all, instead relying on fundraising rounds from venture-capital firms. “Let’s say you’re a high flying startup who banked with SVB, raised $100 million, burns a million dollars a month, and has no revenue,” the founder says. “You’re actually f—ed.”

Source: https://time.com/6262009/silicon-valley-bank-deposit-insurance/
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
A tech vendor emailed me today and asked that were send our monthly payment to them a different way. They bank with SVB
 
This is how this becomes problematic.

"And many start-ups in Silicon Valley don’t generate revenue at all, instead relying on fundraising rounds from venture-capital firms. “Let’s say you’re a high flying startup who banked with SVB, raised $100 million, burns a million dollars a month, and has no revenue,” the founder says. “You’re actually f—ed.”

Source: https://time.com/6262009/silicon-valley-bank-deposit-insurance/
“Don’t generate revenue” = hard to blame others. Relied on others (debt) and it backfired. Sorry. Your Going to have to find someone else to carry the load while you tinker.
 
“Don’t generate revenue” = hard to blame others. Relied on others (debt) and it backfired. Sorry. Your Going to have to find someone else to carry the load while you tinker.
Not quite right. It was cash money deposits that were going to evaporate.

I bought some PacWest yesterday, FWIW.
 
By backstopping SVB, the Fed has essentially said that there is no limit to deposit guarantees. That should calm nerves short term, but at the same time, if the Fed does raise the interest rate next week, I can see the same VCs going batshit again and causing problems.
 
By backstopping SVB, the Fed has essentially said that there is no limit to deposit guarantees. That should calm nerves short term, but at the same time, if the Fed does raise the interest rate next week, I can see the same VCs going batshit again and causing problems.
Why? The Fed is definitely raising next week. Unless the Treasury forces mark-to-market on HTM funds (that would cause a problem!), it doesn't matter. Right?
 


Will be interesting to see if the big players start filing these for emergency liquidity or if they are planning to pick up some smaller banks at a discount.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Daddy Kang
Why? The Fed is definitely raising next week. Unless the Treasury forces mark-to-market on HTM funds (that would cause a problem!), it doesn't matter. Right?
Oh would that cause a problem. There is an irrational sense with some regional banks. It's not like we didn't already know about the MBS that many of them carry, but I've seen a bunch of VCs and hedge funds guys throwing fits online about it. Look at the beating Schwab took today. Part of me really wonders if it's not all show just to keep the Fed from raising rates further.
 
I read this morning that BoA has $113billion in unrealized losses on its balance sheet. That represents over 60% of its book value. Thankfully for them, people pulling out of regional banks has added $19 billion in deposits this week.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron