That is lipstick on a pig.
Agree and if the late night windows are so valuable they should all rush to add Hawaii
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is lipstick on a pig.
****, these days nothing is impossibleThere are several comments that the announcement is that 4 Big12 schools are joining the PAC. What kind of drugs must you be on to think this? That's Bill Walton level of burnt out.
That is lipstick on a pig.
Not sure Stanford will care about that. Pretty sure the majority of that 'fanbase' is unaware they even have a football team.SDSU and......
They need a partner. Maybe Stanford will hold their nose to allow for Boise as they are facing a conference collapse. But otherwise, SMU seems like a good option with the Big12 all but killing the AAC.
Guessing what he's saying isBut why is the B1G below?
I've heard rumblings that the B!G is divided on westward expansion, which the commish continues to leave the door open, and the conference hasn't actually acted on it.
That could be the divide. Not sure what the announcement would be though in this context.
Meaning everyone on same page?
Maybe he is saying the Big12 is aligned on wanting to poach the P10, but the P10 is aligned on everyone staying together?? Although the latter sure doesn't seem that way from the outside.Guessing what he's saying is
SEC - Obviously united
Vacant - guessing hes saying there's a gap but its weird to rank that spot still. Cant imagine he's implying there's a new conference coming or something. That's way too left field.
Big 12/ Pac 12 - not sure if he's saying the Pac 12 is unified or the Big 12 is in wild dissary. Neither seems correct
Big 10 - only thing i got here is that maybe there's tension with the presidents and Warren on expansion? Warren wanting more and the presidents saying no? Weird one
ACC - I can buy internal strife in there. Clemson, FSU, The U, UVA, UNC wanting to break the contract and everyone else saying no.
Idk, none of these make sense unless some really weird ****, like Amazon or Apple creating their own conference and buying teams for it happens, which is an OTT idea itself
I'm sure he's in the know on PAC stuff but I'm not buying that he knows what's happening in the inner workings of the other P5 conferences. What I've read is that currently Iowa and OSU aren't as jazzed on more immediate expansion as the other schools but his take is a pretty serious stretch.Guessing what he's saying is
SEC - Obviously united
Vacant - guessing hes saying there's a gap but its weird to rank that spot still. Cant imagine he's implying there's a new conference coming or something. That's way too left field.
Big 12/ Pac 12 - not sure if he's saying the Pac 12 is unified or the Big 12 is in wild dissary. Neither seems correct
Big 10 - only thing i got here is that maybe there's tension with the presidents and Warren on expansion? Warren wanting more and the presidents saying no? Weird one
ACC - I can buy internal strife in there. Clemson, FSU, The U, UVA, UNC wanting to break the contract and everyone else saying no.
Idk, none of these make sense unless some really weird ****, like Amazon or Apple creating their own conference and buying teams for it happens, which is an OTT idea itself
San Diego St to the PAC.
That's my wild ass guess.
Oh really?? SDSU wouldn't move your needle???Typically I would say that any expansion would be tied to media rights. But SDSU wouldn't move the needle on Media Right$ so that might be accurate.
This group of ASU 4’s would not move my needle.Oh really?? SDSU wouldn't move your needle???
![]()
![]()
Freakin' elitist.This group of ASU 4’s would not move my needle.
I think that's real and not just rumblings. It's been reported on. But I'm also skeptical that's causing any meaningful division in the league. Given the contract they just signed, and the fact that most of the travel burden of their recent expansion is going to fall on USC and UCLA, I think that's more of a shrug than a real strategic disagreement.
Check back in on the thread in 4 hrs. If there aren’t many posts it’s because the 4 hr mark has passed and a lot of users are at the dr.Oh really?? SDSU wouldn't move your needle???
![]()
![]()
New PAC-12 logo and branding news.![]()
I suspect most are checking back in 20-30 seconds.Check back in on the thread in 4 hrs. If there aren’t many posts it’s because the 4 hr mark has passed and a lot of users are at the dr.