College FB Players Unionizing according to this report

Everyone knows it’s pay for play, not NIL. It’s no surprise a B1G school is starting it, knowing how much money the conference/schools are getting because of them.
 
Yes.


Maybe they will try a new tactic.
That ruling was revisited by the NLRB last fall and reversed
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: tzjung and cycloneG
Don't you have to be an "employee" to be part of a labor union? It may not be formally recognized by the department of labor. (not necessarily illegal, but not official).

Technically yes, they probably would be a union not recognized by the NLRB or protected by the NLRA. There is nothing illegal about that though.
 
If we ever want to get NIL under control and have a little more competitive balance a players union is probably needed.
 
If we ever want to get NIL under control and have a little more competitive balance a players union is probably needed.
Employment and CBA are the only way to bring order

Shoving big business into amateurism will eventually break- we’re at that point.

If we don’t want athletes to be able to transfer like normal students, compensate them for the value added to the business that comes with the stability transfer rules.
 
If we ever want to get NIL under control and have a little more competitive balance a players union is probably needed.
Would be surprised if NIL would be addressed by a players union or advocacy group.

I would think medical coverage, practice conditions, hours, coaching treatment and other cultural issues will be initial focus. The obvious bigger, future step is employee status for student athletes.

Employee status, unionization/collective bargaining are as big an issue as the realignment push. IMO could be a more transformational issue, as I think schools will have to decide which model they will support:
  1. Athletes as Employees (Minor League Sport & AD Separated from University)
  2. Ivy League Approach with more Unicorn & Rainbow Student/Athlete Approach
 
Employment and CBA are the only way to bring order

Shoving big business into amateurism will eventually break- we’re at that point.

If we don’t want athletes to be able to transfer like normal students, compensate them for the value added to the business that comes with the stability transfer rules.

CBA brings antitrust protection, which in turn allows rules/limits on employees which can foster competitive balance. It's really the only way CFB will survive that I can see, so I think it is a good step in right direction.
 
We know where this will wind up. I can’t wait to see the day when Hok players all go on strike because they aren’t getting enough cash or new Corvettes every year.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: aauummm
If student athletes gained employee designation, I'm curious how that would affect their involvement as athletes. Iowa State requires that student employees work no more than 20 hours a week, I believe, and other universities have similar restrictions. Presumably teams and schools could find ways around that or would get rid of the policy if need be, but I assume there would be similar issues that could come up. The NCAA and athletic departments might not care much about maintaining the facade of the "student" part of "student athlete," but many universities still do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Remo Gaggi
Would be surprised if NIL would be addressed by a players union or advocacy group.

I would think medical coverage, practice conditions, hours, coaching treatment and other cultural issues will be initial focus. The obvious bigger, future step is employee status for student athletes.

Employee status, unionization/collective bargaining are as big an issue as the realignment push. IMO could be a more transformational issue, as I think schools will have to decide which model they will support:
  1. Athletes as Employees (Minor League Sport & AD Separated from University, their health, as in essays on https://writix.com/essay-examples/health and other points)
  2. Ivy League Approach with more Unicorn & Rainbow Student/Athlete Approach
The first option with athletes as employees sounds more correct if there will be all the privileges with this status and most importantly in my opinion is the pay.
 
Last edited:
The first option with athletes as employees sounds more correct if there will be all the privileges with this status and most importantly in my opinion is the pay.
But if athletes are employees, then universities open themselves up to liabilities that University Presidents may not want to face. What was the NFL CTE settlement? The NFL has 32 teams, there are about 66 P5 colleges.

What if athletes want lifetime medical expenses for sport related injuries? Would need to insure for knee replacement, shoulder replacement, etc. Most P5 schools have over 400 student athletes in any year.

I agree with ND's AD and many schools would choose participation in an Ivy League model. After all, the schools aren't getting rich off sport. Athletic Departments whether they are Texas, Kansas or Iowa State spend close to 100% of their revenue.

Sure college sport has benefited some schools, but I would be surprised if there is much impact for large state universities like ISU.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron