Preseason poll ...

Texas continuing to be rated in the top half of the league really baffles me. Why people think Sark is going to be a success there, I have no idea.

As far as ISU, losing what - 90% of our production last year - and still being rated 6th shows the respect Campbell has earned. Previous years we would be rated much lower with that kind of production loss.
 
Kleiman is 5-4, 4-5, and 4-5 in conference since taking over at K-State. Meanwhile Campbell has never had a sub-500 record after his first year at ISU and finished no lower than 4th in conference. Who do you think is most likely to exceed expectations based on those records?
 
Who gave us a 1st place vote?

Maybe it was Gage Church, editor of the Ames Tribune. We know for a fact that it wasn't Randy Pete.

"After winning last season’s Big 12 Football Championship, Baylor was picked to repeat in the Conference’s 2022 preseason poll, voted on by media representatives. "

 
Texas continuing to be rated in the top half of the league really baffles me. Why people think Sark is going to be a success there, I have no idea.

As far as ISU, losing what - 90% of our production last year - and still being rated 6th shows the respect Campbell has earned. Previous years we would be rated much lower with that kind of production loss.
Outside of Washington and USC, Sark has been a successful head coach everywhere he's been.
 
Kleiman is 5-4, 4-5, and 4-5 in conference since taking over at K-State. Meanwhile Campbell has never had a sub-500 record after his first year at ISU and finished no lower than 4th in conference. Who do you think is most likely to exceed expectations based on those records?
Klieman by far. K-State is grossly underrated, as usual.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron