Twister Sister Summary - ladies fall in Sweet 16

acoustimac

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2009
6,645
6,724
113
Lamoni, IA
Prior to the game I posted some questions about the game. Well here are the answers.
1. can Creighton handle our bigs and Ashley inside? Yes. When the bigs miss layups and Ashley gets swarmed with not help.
2. will our drive and pass work? At times it was unstoppable. Em drove all day and scored. Others tried and missed.
3. can we guard their guards? In other words, can we knock them off their game? A big fat resounding NO. At times Creighton put on a clinic at our expense.
4. how will the game be called? some ticky tack stuff called. Overall not bad.
5. will ISU be on from deep (which is the key to every other part of our offense)? No. Lukewarm. We missed a bunch of wide open looks while shooting 32% overall.
6. Knowing we don’t really like pressure, will Creighton use their depth to hammer us full court? No.

The game started out with both teams trading blows. Diew started it for ISU with an opening three and I was hopeful that was a good sign. Sadly, it wasn't. Our team was colder than molasses in winter time from deep in the first half. Meanwhile Creighton seemingly almost hit their per game average in the first half. Whatever we did on defense just didn't work. Creighton either had wide open threes or cut to the basket and took advantage of our lack of foot speed to chew us alive. In the second quarter Ash went to the bench with two fouls and quite surprisingly the team stayed with Creighton. Just enough stops and a few baskets here and there and the half time score was tied at 30. I really thought at this point Coach Fen would make some defensive adjustments and we'd be ok. Surely we'd get better shooting right?

The third quarter was one of the worst I've seen since perhaps the beat downs by Baylor or Texas. Creighton came out and literally sliced and diced the sisters. They would find open threes. They would cut or drive to the basket. It all seemed to work and meanwhile the Sisters continued to struggle. When the smoke started to clear in the 4th quarter Creighton had built a 13 point lead and it seemed like this one was in the books. But, as you would expect the ladies still had fight left in their bones. They actually drew within three before making a few critical errors that shifted the game back in Creighton's direction. The ladies had to start fouling and hoping they could in turn score at the other end. It just didn't happen as even Creighton's worst free throw shooter was nearly perfect. In the end the better team won this game 76-68.

Observations
Defense - I was puzzled that our defense didn't seem more prepared for what Creighton was doing. It was the same thing they had done all season and yet our ladies seemed a step slow or way out of position all night long. The best defense we played was the last five minutes of the 4th quarter. So what changed?

Posts - our posts were an absolute non-factor tonight. They were slow plow horses compared to Creighton's quarter horses. Inside or outside (they were guarding guards) they couldn't keep up on defense. On offense they just couldn't find the hoop. 3 points and 7 boards between them. Much of what happened in the third quarter centered around their inability to cover on defense (although others had the same problem).

Playing fire with fire - Coach Fen waited until part way through the 4th to move away from our bigs and insert faster smaller players in an effort to slow Creighton down. Didn't always work, but they started getting some stops. Strangely after seeing Iowa's Czinano eat Creighton up inside our posts couldn't come close to replicating her effort. The only option was go small.

The three - When you watched the game you'd swear we made a total of about 5 threes and Creighton hit 21. In fact, Creighton only hit 3 more than we did on the same number of attempts. The difference was timing...when they happened. Creighton found themselves wide open time after time after time and it stymied anything ISU seemed to have going at the time.

In the lane. At one point Creighton had 24 points in the lane. These were slice and dice cuts to the hoop and it worked over and over again. They executed their offense quite well.

Our offense - for much of the game it seemed like our ladies were very disjointed. No flow to the offense and once we started missing it seemed like frustration set in a little bit.

The stat line - go look at it. Every single line of it looks nearly identical. Creighton made a couple more free throws. Made 3 more treys. Made a total of two more shots than the Sisters. Rebounds even. Turnovers even. The big difference? Assists. They had 7 more assists and each one was a knife in our back.

Ashley - sadly she picked up two fouls early and had to sit the bulk of the second quarter. We never really saw her exert her dominance as we expect. 3-11 from the floor, but 7-7 from the line. Without her offensive presence we were hurting. 14 points and 4 boards on what I hope isn't her last game in a Cyclone uniform.

Em - The little general did everything she could tonight. Made some mistakes - yes. A few of those "what were you thinking" moments. But her drives down the lane were fun to watch. 22 points, 6 assists, and 8 boards. Wow. She was the main reason we had any chance to win this game. 2:1 assist to turnover ratio.

Donarski - she started the game hot on defense and cold on offense. Made some exceptional hands plays. Did get beat a few times to the hoop, but she was working her butt off. Another tough shooting night missing threes and layups. 11 points and 3 boards. Another big missing link in our offense.

Diew - Probably the most improved player on this year's squad. She hit some critical threes. Played decent defense (although she was victimized a couple of times leaving open three point shooters). What a pleasant surprise she has been. Maybe her best game of the year tonight with 15 big points and 5 boards.

The bench - just not much happened there. four total points. One single player from Creighton's bench more than tripled that output.

So disappointing. I told friends that I just had to tip my hat to Creighton. You could tell their players were having fun. They knew their offense and ran it almost effortlessly, and their quickness exposed some of our flaws. The two teams were called "mirrors" of each other, but in actuality Creighton has some things we don't have. Namely, bench production and better team speed. On the other side, our team (like the one in the Replacements) has grit by the bucket load. Many teams might have folded when down by 13 and everything going the other way. Not our Sisters. They reached inside and grabbed some of that grit and found a way to cut that lead to almost nothing. Almost. Sadly, that "almost" means the most successful team (by win) in ISU history is done for the year. What a ride it was. We were privileged to watch some outstanding basketball and are able to say we were a part of it all. Thanks ladies. It's most definitely been fun.

Now for the waiting game. The only question remaining to be answered is what will Ashley do? Will she choose to go pro or will she decide to take one more stab at it? Of course I selfishly want her to come back next year. We will have a deeper bench with Fritz returning. We will be adding Shantavia Dawkins from Canada as another guard. It's possible the transfer portal might yield something, but I'm not sure what the team would be looking for. So, the question remains...what will Ashley do? Previously I was leaning 60-40 on a return. After tonight I think it is a total toss up. The rest of the team returns. You know this outstanding sophomore class will have fire burning in their veins to take things farther. Fritz will be ready to go. Hopefully our posts will make some marked improvement as well. The clock ticks while we wait on the big decision...
 
Prior to the game I posted some questions about the game. Well here are the answers.
1. can Creighton handle our bigs and Ashley inside? Yes. When the bigs miss layups and Ashley gets swarmed with not help.
2. will our drive and pass work? At times it was unstoppable. Em drove all day and scored. Others tried and missed.
3. can we guard their guards? In other words, can we knock them off their game? A big fat resounding NO. At times Creighton put on a clinic at our expense.
4. how will the game be called? some ticky tack stuff called. Overall not bad.
5. will ISU be on from deep (which is the key to every other part of our offense)? No. Lukewarm. We missed a bunch of wide open looks while shooting 32% overall.
6. Knowing we don’t really like pressure, will Creighton use their depth to hammer us full court? No.

The game started out with both teams trading blows. Diew started it for ISU with an opening three and I was hopeful that was a good sign. Sadly, it wasn't. Our team was colder than molasses in winter time from deep in the first half. Meanwhile Creighton seemingly almost hit their per game average in the first half. Whatever we did on defense just didn't work. Creighton either had wide open threes or cut to the basket and took advantage of our lack of foot speed to chew us alive. In the second quarter Ash went to the bench with two fouls and quite surprisingly the team stayed with Creighton. Just enough stops and a few baskets here and there and the half time score was tied at 30. I really thought at this point Coach Fen would make some defensive adjustments and we'd be ok. Surely we'd get better shooting right?

The third quarter was one of the worst I've seen since perhaps the beat downs by Baylor or Texas. Creighton came out and literally sliced and diced the sisters. They would find open threes. They would cut or drive to the basket. It all seemed to work and meanwhile the Sisters continued to struggle. When the smoke started to clear in the 4th quarter Creighton had built a 13 point lead and it seemed like this one was in the books. But, as you would expect the ladies still had fight left in their bones. They actually drew within three before making a few critical errors that shifted the game back in Creighton's direction. The ladies had to start fouling and hoping they could in turn score at the other end. It just didn't happen as even Creighton's worst free throw shooter was nearly perfect. In the end the better team won this game 76-68.

Observations
Defense - I was puzzled that our defense didn't seem more prepared for what Creighton was doing. It was the same thing they had done all season and yet our ladies seemed a step slow or way out of position all night long. The best defense we played was the last five minutes of the 4th quarter. So what changed?

Posts - our posts were an absolute non-factor tonight. They were slow plow horses compared to Creighton's quarter horses. Inside or outside (they were guarding guards) they couldn't keep up on defense. On offense they just couldn't find the hoop. 3 points and 7 boards between them. Much of what happened in the third quarter centered around their inability to cover on defense (although others had the same problem).

Playing fire with fire - Coach Fen waited until part way through the 4th to move away from our bigs and insert faster smaller players in an effort to slow Creighton down. Didn't always work, but they started getting some stops. Strangely after seeing Iowa's Czinano eat Creighton up inside our posts couldn't come close to replicating her effort. The only option was go small.

The three - When you watched the game you'd swear we made a total of about 5 threes and Creighton hit 21. In fact, Creighton only hit 3 more than we did on the same number of attempts. The difference was timing...when they happened. Creighton found themselves wide open time after time after time and it stymied anything ISU seemed to have going at the time.

In the lane. At one point Creighton had 24 points in the lane. These were slice and dice cuts to the hoop and it worked over and over again. They executed their offense quite well.

Our offense - for much of the game it seemed like our ladies were very disjointed. No flow to the offense and once we started missing it seemed like frustration set in a little bit.

The stat line - go look at it. Every single line of it looks nearly identical. Creighton made a couple more free throws. Made 3 more treys. Made a total of two more shots than the Sisters. Rebounds even. Turnovers even. The big difference? Assists. They had 7 more assists and each one was a knife in our back.

Ashley - sadly she picked up two fouls early and had to sit the bulk of the second quarter. We never really saw her exert her dominance as we expect. 3-11 from the floor, but 7-7 from the line. Without her offensive presence we were hurting. 14 points and 4 boards on what I hope isn't her last game in a Cyclone uniform.

Em - The little general did everything she could tonight. Made some mistakes - yes. A few of those "what were you thinking" moments. But her drives down the lane were fun to watch. 22 points, 6 assists, and 8 boards. Wow. She was the main reason we had any chance to win this game. 2:1 assist to turnover ratio.

Donarski - she started the game hot on defense and cold on offense. Made some exceptional hands plays. Did get beat a few times to the hoop, but she was working her butt off. Another tough shooting night missing threes and layups. 11 points and 3 boards. Another big missing link in our offense.

Diew - Probably the most improved player on this year's squad. She hit some critical threes. Played decent defense (although she was victimized a couple of times leaving open three point shooters). What a pleasant surprise she has been. Maybe her best game of the year tonight with 15 big points and 5 boards.

The bench - just not much happened there. four total points. One single player from Creighton's bench more than tripled that output.

So disappointing. I told friends that I just had to tip my hat to Creighton. You could tell their players were having fun. They knew their offense and ran it almost effortlessly, and their quickness exposed some of our flaws. The two teams were called "mirrors" of each other, but in actuality Creighton has some things we don't have. Namely, bench production and better team speed. On the other side, our team (like the one in the Replacements) has grit by the bucket load. Many teams might have folded when down by 13 and everything going the other way. Not our Sisters. They reached inside and grabbed some of that grit and found a way to cut that lead to almost nothing. Almost. Sadly, that "almost" means the most successful team (by win) in ISU history is done for the year. What a ride it was. We were privileged to watch some outstanding basketball and are able to say we were a part of it all. Thanks ladies. It's most definitely been fun.

Now for the waiting game. The only question remaining to be answered is what will Ashley do? Will she choose to go pro or will she decide to take one more stab at it? Of course I selfishly want her to come back next year. We will have a deeper bench with Fritz returning. We will be adding Shantavia Dawkins from Canada as another guard. It's possible the transfer portal might yield something, but I'm not sure what the team would be looking for. So, the question remains...what will Ashley do? Previously I was leaning 60-40 on a return. After tonight I think it is a total toss up. The rest of the team returns. You know this outstanding sophomore class will have fire burning in their veins to take things farther. Fritz will be ready to go. Hopefully our posts will make some marked improvement as well. The clock ticks while we wait on the big decision...
Very poor coaching by Bill.
Poor plan and no timely adjustments.
Better team won.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ISU71
We should never lose to a Creighton. But ISU got outplayed tonight. Like the Iowa game, the Jays were a step ahead almost the entire way. We didn't necessarily do anything wrong and you certainly cannot blame the refs. Creighton just did everything correctly when they needed to and made their shots around the basket. We got beat, plain and simple. Hope we see Ashley next year, but I'm not holding my breath. Making the Sweet 16 was a big goal for them, but was it enough for her to say "yeah, I'm good"?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY and cyclone13
Creighton played way better and deserved it. ISU was flat and poor on defense. 8 games out of 10 ISU wins. Not with the effort tonight.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: TrulyCyclone
This is a very good team but not an excellent team. Like cyfan92 said: this is the ceiling of the team. Can’t fault the effort. Still love this team, just disappointed because we should have beaten Creighton and gone to Elite 8.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GT25Ump and joefrog
Creighton simply made more shots. We lost by 8, not playing our best game and missed at least 7 or 8 layups. I know my math is not always correct but make half of those missed layups and just 1 of the many open threes that bounced the wrong way and the outcome is different.
Creighton played lights out, sometimes basketball is simple, make more shots and you win.
 
Creighton simply made more shots. We lost by 8, not playing our best game and missed at least 7 or 8 layups. I know my math is not always correct but make half of those missed layups and just 1 of the many open threes that bounced the wrong way and the outcome is different.
Creighton played lights out, sometimes basketball is simple, make more shots and you win.
That pretty much spells this one out. If we shot anywhere close to how we did against Georgia we win going away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jnecker4cy
Half way through the 3rd Q I was begging Bill to go with the lineup that finished the game (Ryan, Joens, Donarski, Diew, and Joens). The two bigs and MEM were just getting killed on the back cuts to the basket. Possibly could have stemmed the bleeding. Creighton certainly deserved the win.
 
Bill has got to address the over dribbling and lack of motion offensively. Biggest reason why this team went 0-5 against BU and UT and CU displayed vs TOE and ISU why talent gets maxed when running motion.

And from a roster and talent standpoint, the lack of a true 4 and the limitations at the 5 also put a ceiling on what this team could achieve. Will be interesting to see how this addressed via the portal in the off season.
 
Half way through the 3rd Q I was begging Bill to go with the lineup that finished the game (Ryan, Joens, Donarski, Diew, and Joens). The two bigs and MEM were just getting killed on the back cuts to the basket. Possibly could have stemmed the bleeding. Creighton certainly deserved the win.
Aubrey was getting killed too. We had four players in the game who could defend: Ashley, Emily, Lexi, Nyamer. Creighton kept finding the player guarded by #5.
 
Aubrey was getting killed too. We had four players in the game who could defend: Ashley, Emily, Lexi, Nyamer. Creighton kept finding the player guarded by #5.
Aubrey was the worst of the five but was at least contesting. Our bigs and MEM had a Bluejay lay up line going. Enough of that, though.

Great season, ladies.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GT25Ump and Cyclad
Thanks @acoustimac. That is a great analysis.

I would add a few more details from my perspective.

1. I wondered if Diew would be 100% after having her nose broken. It seemed like the game plan was for her to come out hot in order to see what she could do. She did great. Probably the most confident and effective that I've ever seen her.

2. Aubrey may have been the difference maker. Didn't she have 3 three-pointers that essentially went in, but back out? She was "this close" to 9 more points!

3. I really like the looks that Jordao was getting around the basket, but she didn't seem to have a very good touch on the shots. She may have left another 8 or 10 points in the paint.

4. Creighton's offensive sets were magnificent. They were amazing at getting into position and then getting the ball to the right person in the right place at the right time. It made me wonder if we shouldn't have switched more to zone defenses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: acoustimac
4. Creighton's offensive sets were magnificent. They were amazing at getting into position and then getting the ball to the right person in the right place at the right time. It made me wonder if we shouldn't have switched more to zone defenses.
Zone is hard against a team that can shoot like Creighton. IIRC we did some zone to start the second half and it failed miserably.
 
We looked slow, tired not crisp in any phase of the game. IDK if it was nerves or we hit the wall physically and emotionally. Hope AJ comes back and bigs can improve. We are good could be great. Guards are the best since Freese and Taylor. Good job ladies
 
Missed bunnies hurt. Don't want to criticize Bill, but I did not understand our game plan at all.

Good season. Glad we did not lose to Iowa playing that way. Creighton likely to get destroyed inside by SC.
 
I agree with the tired comment. We played at or after 9 twice (it was 9:30 on the east coast) and both times looked sluggish. Dont get me wrong, thats a poor excuse and a lot else went wrong, but I do wonder how much that start time affected us (and I know Creighton played at the same time). Hats off to Creighton, they ran great offense. But our offense, I really feel, we just missed shots.

Oh well, at least we had the opportunity. Really believed this team would be more than capable of beating a Creighton-esque team one more time, as we had 28 other times. Great, record breaking season and nothing to be ashamed off. Sad they miss the best ever moniker by failing to show up in the sweet sixteen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GT25Ump
This season as with many others the 3 was a critical factor. In the 7 games we lost we avg 20.8 attempts and 6.8 makes and I believe we avg 10+ makes on the year. The game stats were pretty even ( as acoustimac pointed out) except the 3 more by Creighton which was the difference. This has been a fun team to watch this year waiting to hear what Ash does and looking forward to next year. And remember these are young women not machines playing this game and we will have great nights, good ones and poor shooting ones.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron