Since I don't work tomorrow and can't sleep...
The bubble teams, for the most part, are below...with resume highlights and/or lowlights included. There is no rhyme or reason to the way they're listed, by the way...
If a team like North Carolina is a play in game like Lunardi has them with their resume, how in the world wouldn't we be a play in game even if we lost out? I don't want to see that happen obviously...just trying to show that we are sitting better than literally everyone on this list if you look strictly at quality wins and losses. And it's not even close. For God's sakes, I just watch Katz talk about his last four teams in etc from Saturday and he has West Virginia as the 8th team out?! The fact they are even in the conversation at this point shows how weak the bubble is but also how GOOD the Big 12 is.
The bubble teams, for the most part, are below...with resume highlights and/or lowlights included. There is no rhyme or reason to the way they're listed, by the way...
- Iowa State (NET 35; Q1 = 8)
- Oklahoma (NET 45; Q1 = 3; Q3 losses = 1)
- Rutgers (NET 80; Q1 = 6; Q3 losses = 2; Q4 losses = 1)
- San Francisco (NET 29; Q1 = 3; Q3 losses = 1; Q4 losses = 1)
- North Carolina (NET 42; Q1 = 1; Q4 losses = 1)
- Memphis (NET 44; Q1 = 3; Q3 losses = 2)
- SMU (NET 46; Q1 = 2; Q3 losses = 1; Q4 losses = 1)
- Michigan (NET 34; Q1 = 3; Q3 losses = 1)
- Creighton (NET 62; Q1 = 3; Q3 losses = 1)
- BYU (NET 54; Q1 = 3; Q4 losses = 1)
- Oregon (NET 63; Q1 = 2; Q3 losses = 3)
- San Diego State (NET 32; Q1 = 2)
- Kansas State (NET 60; Q1 = 4)
- Florida (NET 40; Q1 = 2; Q4 losses = 1)
- Mississippi State (NET 47; Q1 = 2; Q3 losses = 2)
- Virginia Tech (NET 41; Q1 = 0; Q3 losses = 2)
- Wyoming (NET 38; Q1 = 3; Q3 losses = 2)
- Seton Hall (NET 36; Q1 = 5)
- Notre Dame (NET 57; Q1 = 2; Q3 losses = 1)
- Marquette (NET 33; Q1 = 7)
- Loyola-Chicago (NET 37; Q1 = 2; Q3 losses = 1)
- Colorado State (NET 31; Q1 = 3; Q3 losses = 1)
- Miami (NET 65; Q1 = 4; Q3 losses = 3)
- Boise State (NET 30; Q1 = 4; Q4 losses = 1)
- Wake Forest (NET 40; Q1 = 1)
- St. Mary's (NET 21; Q1 = 3)
- Davidson (NET 50; Q1 wins = 2)
- North Texas (NET 39; Q1 = 1; Q3 losses = 1)
- TCU (NET 56; Q1 = 4)
- Indiana (NET 43; Q1 = 2)
- Iowa (NET 19; Q1 = 1)
If a team like North Carolina is a play in game like Lunardi has them with their resume, how in the world wouldn't we be a play in game even if we lost out? I don't want to see that happen obviously...just trying to show that we are sitting better than literally everyone on this list if you look strictly at quality wins and losses. And it's not even close. For God's sakes, I just watch Katz talk about his last four teams in etc from Saturday and he has West Virginia as the 8th team out?! The fact they are even in the conversation at this point shows how weak the bubble is but also how GOOD the Big 12 is.
Last edited: