Big 12 Seeding for Wrestling

buf87

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2010
10,960
9,767
113
Iowa
Who is going to guess on seedings.
125, 174 and 197 are a mess.

Only sure bets are
125 - Cardinale or Mastro - both have one conference loss to Terukina
133 - Fix at #1
149 - Gfeller at #1
157 - Carr at #1
165 - O Toole at #1
184 - Keck at #1
285 - Henrickson at #1
 
Last edited:
Who is going to guess on seedings.
125 and 197 are a mess.

Only sure bets are
133 - Fix at #1
157 - Carr at #1
165 - O Toole at #1
184 - Keck at #1
I would assume the AF heavy is #1. Don't see anyone beating that brute.
 
I would assume the AF heavy is #1. Don't see anyone beating that brute.
Has he wrestled Andrews of Wyoming? I guess I can look at wrestlestat

I see he is undefeated and Andrews didn't wrestle in that dual. Wonder why Flo has Andrews ranked ahead of him
 
Why wouldn't Ian get the 1 seed? Give it to the SDSU kid?
 
Why wouldn't Ian get the 1 seed? Give it to the SDSU kid?
He could. His only loss is at 149, right? Haven't looked at the others. Lack of matches might hurt.

I would guess Carlson, but he has 2 losses to Hart. Hart has losses to Alirez, Happel and Smith of Utah Valley
 
Last edited:
He could. His only loss is at 149, right? Haven't looked at the others. Lack of matches might hurt.

I would guess Carlson, but he has 2 losses to Hart. Hart has losses to Alirez, Happel and Smith of Utah Valley
And I believe Ian is like 3-0 lifetime versus Carlson, and a returning Big 12 Finalist, and a Big 12 Champion, so...who knows.
 
And I believe Ian is like 3-0 lifetime versus Carlson, and a returning Big 12 Finalist, and a Big 12 Champion, so...who knows.
I would guess #2 for Parker, but not sure how they will look at a full schedule of Carlson with 1 conference loss vs a partial schedule of Parker with 0 losses
 
I would guess #2 for Parker, but not sure how they will look at a full schedule of Carlson with 1 conference loss vs a partial schedule of Parker with 0 losses
Yeah, hard to say. As I look at our schedule (despite not really wrestling 141 until January) Parker only missed 1 Big 12 dual (Air Force), so it was not like he ducked anyone. I guess either way it really doesn't matter, you have to beat whoever is out there on the line.
 
Will be weird watching him wrestle someone other than Demas in the finals.
 
This is how I'd have it right now, knowing that there are still 4 conference duals this weekend (WYO/WVU, OU/OSU, UNC/AF, NDSU/SDSU) which could shift things around:

125- Mastrogiovanni 4-1, Cardinale 4-1, Teske 5-2, Surtin 4-2, Terukina 5-3, Prata 3-2

133- Fix 8-0, Biscoglia 8-1, March 3-2, Attasauov 4-3

141- Parker 6-0, Hart 6-3, Carlson 7-3, Young 4-2

149- Gfeller 6-0, McDougald 4-0, Degen 7-2, Edmond 7-3

157- Carr 6-0, Franek 7-1, Sheets 6-2, Jacques 7-5, Holschlag 5-3

165- O'Toole 5-0, Hall 5-2, Yant 6-1, Wittlake 4-2, Weber 5-3

174- Plott 6-0, DeVos 4-2, Hastings 4-2

184- Keckeisen 9-0, Kent 6-2, Coleman 6-3, Samuelson 4-1, Geer 4-3

197- Buchanan 6-1, Sloan 6-1, Bastida 5-2, Elam 6-3, Pentz 5-2

285- Elam 7-1, Hendrickson 5-0, Schuyler 6-2, Nevills 5-2, Wolfgram 4-2
 
74 is a real **** weight to seed after the top 3 because there are so few HTH matches (26) thanks to a bunch of guys who split time with teammates.

Most of the other weights have 35+ matches between the 12 guys.
 
Parker at 1 with Young at 4 would be great. 2/3 with Hart & Carlson .

Where would Alirez be?
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron