ISR March to Madness thread
- Thread starter dexterhawk
- Start date
That's more reflective of bracketologists seeding right now too. Most have the 2 as a 8/9 seed and Iowa State just a little higher
What happened to Maryland? They used to be a team that would make sweet sixteen or better on a somewhat regular basis it seems. They are just a bad team now.
Memphis is very Jekyll and Hyde also. Lose to #205 and #184, then beat #5 and #22.
I think Rutgers is really dependent on an extremely physical game. If it is called tight at all they are screwed. If they really allow a ton of contact they can thrive. I don’t know if it is a strategy like the old Frank Martin murderball, they can’t call them all games. Generally Rutgers is a really rugged but pretty unskilled team. Their ball handling is incredibly horrible. But damn they are physical. Penn State is a bit like that too. They kind of suck, but they have some grown ass men that will beat the hell out of you if the officials let them play.
Made the tournament 5 of 6 of last six years and would have made it the year it was cancelled. Made it to the sweet 16 once and made it to the round of 32 three times. Maryland fans don't have realistic expectations.
Leaving the ACC, if you're a bball fan, is tough.
It's going to be a mediocre program going forward IMO.
Not bad, I was thinking he made an elite 8. Then at the end the wheels fell off. Isnt Danny Manning the coach now?
O, those are all the ones that have Iowa and Houston high too. So you agree with those when comparing Oklahoma State and Virginia but not Iowa, Houston, and maybe a few selective others?
