Report: OU & Texas reach out to join SEC

It’s unsettling but you make a good point that if they were gonna take us, they wouldn’t say so. Of course if they were NOT gonna take us, they also wouldn’t say so. So we get to wait in uncomfortable silence. I know Pollard being quiet is the best thing but my dumb ass just wants him to come out and say Don’t worry, we have a master plan.
Best not to play your cards too early. Given contract dispute, it's no wonder the B12 isn't mentioned.
 
It’s unsettling but you make a good point that if they were gonna take us, they wouldn’t say so. Of course if they were NOT gonna take us, they also wouldn’t say so. So we get to wait in uncomfortable silence. I know Pollard being quiet is the best thing but my dumb ass just wants him to come out and say Don’t worry, we have a master plan.

Add my dumb ass to this, 1,000%
 
  • Like
Reactions: CYTUTT
Not exactly the most comforting to hear your conference is left out of all of these talks. But this still might be a good thing in the long run. It’s at least better than the SEC poaching everybody.

I assume that if there's an alliance there are agreements not to take any schools from the allied conferences. I don't think anyone in the Big 12 would sign off on that right now.
 
I'm not smart buy any means but if the BIG/PAC 12/ACC were in talks with Bowlsby they obviously wouldn't say anything or ou and texas would get off free right?
 
It’s unsettling but you make a good point that if they were gonna take us, they wouldn’t say so. Of course if they were NOT gonna take us, they also wouldn’t say so. So we get to wait in uncomfortable silence. I know Pollard being quiet is the best thing but my dumb ass just wants him to come out and say Don’t worry, we have a master plan.

I'm not picking on your response specifically here...

...but this reminds me a little of all the criticism Bowlsby took for not preventing OU and UT from leaving for the SEC. Where was his plan? Why didn't he do something? And while it did look bad that he was caught so off guard, the uncomfortable truth is that there was really probably nothing he could have done.

I think that's a lot like what Pollard is facing here. I'm sure he has a "master plan" but he could execute it brilliantly - indeed, he has been building us up to better position us for this moment for years - and we could still be on the outside looking in. We've done everything we can but we are not in control of our own fate.

(And to be fair, very few schools in our position would be. We're just among the schools who drew the short straw of an unstable conference with bad partners instead of landing in a stable home 100 years ago.)

We just have to hope that sanity prevails at some point. It's unfathomable to me that someone can look at what we've built and say we have no value.
 
Not exactly the most comforting to hear your conference is left out of all of these talks. But this still might be a good thing in the long run. It’s at least better than the SEC poaching everybody.
I just stated in another thread that if this were a bad thing we'd have heard Bowlsby, Pollard, and all the other AD's from the Irate8 absolutely screaming. Instead, we've heard nothing.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cyclonepride
A source at Iowa State mentioned that the Big 12 can't really say anything if they hope to get the $140M out of Texas and Oklahoma.

So no one should be shocked that we are being "excluded" from this

I for one love to see an alliance against the SEC forming. ISU is the only relevant football school having AAU status. We will be fine as long as football stays relevant. Win a Big 12 title and another NY6 bowl is a great way to pave your own path
 
It’s remarkable how the big10 was recently a major player and now has to partner with the pac and acc. Talk about a fall from grace . . .

The B1G absolutely could poach those conferences if they wanted to. Their TV money is going to be double those leagues. The Pac and ACC are saved (if at all) by geography and a GOR that lasts another 15 years, respectively.
 
I'm not smart buy any means but if the BIG/PAC 12/ACC were in talks with Bowlsby they obviously wouldn't say anything or ou and texas would get off free right?


There will not be a big 12 by 2025 at the very latest. there’s no reason for the other conferences to publicly acknowledge any of the remaining schools, because the conference will no longer exist.

At this point, none of the remaining 8 schools matter in these agreements, because they are in a conference that won’t exist.

And also, everybody in these conferences, regardless of affiliation, want ut and ou and Disney to pay for making the move to destroy college Athletics as we know it.

This is not going to settle quickly, it never was. It will be over when exit fees, and revenue, are settled. Until then, we have to be purposely quiet, and let the process complete itself.

I’m quite certain that President Wintersteen, Jamie Pollard, Matt Campbell, and TJ Otzelberger, all have a very good idea what’s going on being the scenes, and where this all ends up for Iowa State
 
I’ll bet JP already has 95% confidence how this is going to go for ISU and where we will end up. He is just too smart to say anything.

I believe after the last go-round, JP has a plan. I’m sure he set contingencies in place to offset sudden changes in the confrence. I obviously don’t know, but most businesses have some kind of threat analysis when borrowing money. COVID was not on the radar. Realignment was and is.
 
I understand that. And it’s hilarious the big10 now needs partners to push their agenda. They used to be on par with the SEC and those days are over.
Hawk trolls can ‘dumb’ this all they want but scott dochterman said the same thing. The delaney days are over for the big10.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Gonzo
Hawk trolls can ‘dumb’ this all they want but scott dochterman said the same thing. The delaney days are over for the big10.
Delaney is still advising the Alliance including the B10. As it relates to the B10, their primary goal is insure Fox has a path to expanded CFP rights which will increase the value of Fox's bid for B10 rights in the new B10 TV deal. And if Fox bids more, then the odds increase they can fund B10 expansion with KU and ISU.
 
Hawk trolls can ‘dumb’ this all they want but scott dochterman said the same thing. The delaney days are over for the big10.

If their agenda is to keep things as they are as much as possible, they need the votes of the other non SEC conferences. In particular if they want to steer who gets the media rights for the playoffs and how many teams can get into the playoffs they can't do that by themselves, nor can the SEC which they're about to find out.
 
Delaney is still advising the Alliance including the B10. As it relates to the B10, their primary goal is insure Fox has a path to expanded CFP rights which will increase the value of Fox's bid for B10 rights in the new B10 TV deal. And if Fox bids more, then the odds increase they can fund B10 expansion with KU and ISU.
There is also the issue with access to the playoffs. The big is worried 6 of the 12 are going to be sec teams.

It’s just interesting how it’s the sec and vs everyone else. Much different dynamic now.
 
I understand that. And it’s hilarious the big10 now needs partners to push their agenda. They used to be on par with the SEC and those days are over.

From a revenue perspective, the Big Ten will remain on par with the SEC in a "per-school" payout. After they kick in their new TV deal in a couple years, there are projections B1G schools will still make more than the SEC schools even with the addition of UT and OU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlySpartan
The ACC can kiss away any talk of them renegotiating their tv deal with ESPN with the ACC joining with the Big 10 & Pac-12 in upsetting the ESPN/SEC master plan of controlling college football.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron