Report: OU & Texas reach out to join SEC

Texas advantages
Location: check
Facilities: check
Rich donors: check
Tradition: check
Big brand: check
Lots of money: check
Top level high school talent: check

I really don’t get how people think Texas is the new Nebraska. Makes no sense.
Completely Untrustworthy: check
Inflated Egos: check
Easily Butthurt: check
Greedy Mofos: check
Logo that looks like a lady’s insides: check
 
HidJKtCZpzR5xLJKKp3kiMDAQT34HN1tJkOu0nxnaTg.jpg
200w.gif
 
No...ESPN is going to pay TX $150 mil they are still owed for the LHN thru the current SEC tv deal which add alot more $$ to SEC for expanding. It increases the SEC TV deal.

Also, ESPN pays for that $150 mil to TX by not having to send money to the 8 other big 12 schools.

This is over.
Just curious. In your model, is TX out revenue or is the rest of the league imbalanced in revenue to adjust for TX admission?
 
Murph seems to think the Big 10 is most likely for us. I wish I was as optimistic as he is about that, because I would bet the Pac 12 is more likely. I hope he's right.
Why does he think the BIG will let us in?
 
Anyone listen to any more podcasts about this today? Post links if you have any good ones
This doesn't talk too much about Iowa State but the Clones are mentioned a bit:

 
  • Like
Reactions: JM4CY
Agreed, there is very little incentive for the B1G to take us on at the moment, unless they really want to go to 16 teams and can't get UNC, UVA, or someone else in a new market to hop over with KU.
There is no way an ACC school is leaving the ACC with their current GOR and media contract, they would lose way too much money for 15 years.
ACC schools are not going to be available for the B1G, its going to be if and what Big 12 schools are the other conferences going to take, because they will be going somewhere, so take them or they will go somewhere else.

What is happening is you have 10 schools that are being thrown into a bucket, with 4 conferences vying for them, 2 schools have been hooked by one of those conferences, leaving 8 schools, for the other 3 conferences to decide if they are going to keep up with the big kid on the block, to take or let another conference take them and possibly leave you behind.

You have Power 5 caliber programs available right now for expansion...where otherwise you only have G5 schools to take if you expand, if you sleep on this other conferences will take them and you will lose out. So I dont see the 3 other conferences not doing something to try to scoop up the rest or most of the rest of the Big 12 before some other conference makes a play for someone they might want.

An Iowa State, Kansas IS way more enticing for expansion than a Cincy or Memphis, and if the B1G misses the chance at us and we go to one of the other conferences and a couple years they decide they have to grow to match the other conferences it will be too late.

This is the issue right now the entire Big 12 is destabilized and the other conferences know it, and the SEC is making a play to jump to the front and control the power structure. The other conferences will have to do something to match them or be left behind.
 
Does Iowa State or any other remaining B12 school help Ohio State make more $$$? I don't know why the Big Ten would rush to grab two more programs if it doesn't increase everyone's piece of the pie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: State2015
Still antiquated thinking. 'Targeted marketing' is the model going forward. The profit margin is significantly better using internet advertising because you have the ability to cookie trail the viewer. So 'blanket' advertising is not the preferred model going forward. But, if you're asking as if we're 10 years in the past, of course Kansas City, St. Louis, and the Des Moines. BUT, if you check the demographics, Des Moines is growing at a faster rate. So, there's that going for you.
Faster rate meaning in the year 2150 Des Moines may have 2.2 million people in which is what the KC metro has now. The reality is that Iowa itself isn't growing at nearly the rate southern states are.
 
Faster rate meaning in the year 2150 Des Moines may have 2.2 million people in which is what the KC metro has now. The reality is that Iowa itself isn't growing at nearly the rate southern states are.
I would be happy to have more sex and do my part but it takes two to tango.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: deadeyededric
You are correct. However, my point is that markets are being less-and-less defined by geography (like an urban area) and more so defined by a shared interest (such as fandom). Yes, having St. Louis be in Missouri is still a big advantage to Missouri but it isn't as big of an advantage as it used to be.
It's a massive advantage having 2 major metro areas in your state compared to a city like Des Moines that isn't even growing at nearly the rate Boise is. We don't have the booster power Mizzou has. Not even close. We also don't have near the political power Missouri does. Iowa is so insignificant in the grand scheme of things.
 
Pete has some great nuggets here (of course, it's all speculation):

- Thinks it's likely to happen ASAP, possibly after this coming year
- ACC had hoped to bring Texas on after GOR + ND, messes with their plans
- A&M may be only "no" in SEC
- Leftovers will have very little interest from other P5 leagues, most likely is a "retooling" of B12 through adding 2-6 schools, 4 seems most likely (Cincy, UCF, USF, BYU, Boise are floated - Houston & SMU less likely as TX schools don't want more competition)

https://sports.yahoo.com/se-cs-cour...big-12-pac-12-big-ten-and-ncaa-190134687.html
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: 2speedy1
I really think it’s 60/40 right now they leave.
I can’t really even predict it at this point. There’s too much we don’t know. It feels like there has to be something going on we don’t know about. It doesn’t make sense for Texas and Oklahoma to pick up and leave just for a prestige badge.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron