So what, you think we’ll end up having to be stuck playing Colorado State now?
I hope not...but if I HAD to guess I would say that is more likely than ending up in the Big 10!?! Just my guess...trying to be realistic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what, you think we’ll end up having to be stuck playing Colorado State now?
I would be willing to wager this has more to do with current negotiations on the next TV contracts, not breaking up revenue sharing.
Have you seen the **** show that is Missouri Athletics. The only way this makes even an ounce of sense is if it is a total breakaway for the P5. Otherwise people should frankly just ignore it.Trust me. Being in the SEC is more prestigious than being in the Big 12. Ask every A.D. who has left. A&M and Missouri are better off as an athletic department going 7-5 in the SEC than goin 10-3 in the Big 12. If being scared of competition was good for your brand nobody would have ever left. $$$$$ builds facilities. Mizzou is better off financially than they ever have been.
You do realize this goes beyond past success historical right? Academics, facilities, current program state, a lot of these play bigger factors.I hope not...but if I HAD to guess I would say that is more likely than ending up in the Big 10!?! Just my guess...trying to be realistic.
I'd agree with this. I think yes to Northwestern, Arkansas idk maybe but they'd maybe go south. Indiana ? NDSU if they bumped which is doubtful. Iowa State has more to offer than it used to and not just because of better football. But does U of I try to block it? Until anything happens it basically comes down to dream scenarios.this is why ive always been a fan of "regions" rather than "conferences"
iowa state
iowa
illinois
wisconsin
minnesota
nebraska
kansas
kansas state
missouri
maybe northwestern, arkansas ?
that would be pretty cool, IMO.
Expanding "just because the SEC" is not a reason to expand. This is all about money, and ISU brings less to the table than they would take.Iowa States ACC accreditation is huge, the B1G puts a huge emphasis on academics. ND isn't joining the B1G, if they join a conference it will be the ACC. As it sits today Kansas would be a no brainer for the B1G and I think Iowa State would be under strong consideration. Who else is the B1G going to grab? I don't see anyone leaving the ACC. If the SEC goes to 16 teams you can bet your sweet a$$ the B1G will follow suit.
Mizzou sucking at football is because Gary Pinkell left and they replaced him by an awful coach. They were winning in the SEC when he was there. They suck at basketball for the same reason which is they have hired awful coaches. It has very little to do with the SEC. They are in a better place financially than they ever have been. The move to the SEC has been good for the University as a whole.Have you seen the **** show that is Missouri Athletics. The only way this makes even an ounce of sense is if it is a total breakaway for the P5. Otherwise people should frankly just ignore it.
Mizzou sucking at football is because Gary Pinkell left and they replaced him by an awful coach. They were winning in the SEC when he was there. They suck at basketball for the same reason which is they have hired awful coaches. It has very little to do with the SEC. They are in a better place financially than they ever have been. The move to the SEC has been good for the University as a whole.
They are better off money wise than if they stayed in the Big 12, but neither OU or UT has a problem raising money, they want to win championships, which are a lot more difficult in the SEC than it is in the Big 12.Trust me. Being in the SEC is more prestigious than being in the Big 12. Ask every A.D. who has left. A&M and Missouri are better off as an athletic department going 7-5 in the SEC than goin 10-3 in the Big 12. If being scared of competition was good for your brand nobody would have ever left. $$$$$ builds facilities. Mizzou is better off financially than they ever have been.
I would be willing to wager this has more to do with current negotiations on the next TV contracts, not breaking up revenue sharing.
Who gives a f about the facilities of consistently losing teams.Trust me. Being in the SEC is more prestigious than being in the Big 12. Ask every A.D. who has left. A&M and Missouri are better off as an athletic department going 7-5 in the SEC than goin 10-3 in the Big 12. If being scared of competition was good for your brand nobody would have ever left. $$$$$ builds facilities. Mizzou is better off financially than they ever have been.
They still recruit Texas kids. Did you forget Texas A&M is in the SEC. You don't think kids from Texas are interested in playing in the SEC?They were winning in the SEC when they had a roster full of Texas kids.... Just like nebby, they walked away from that pipeline when they left the Big 12.
That's what I'm thinking, but the contracts don't expire for another couple years. Seem a little early to begin the "posturing"