The Fran fade

Surprised our resident Hawks aren't here for all this Hawk talk, some of those guys lived on here and now we haven't heard from them in a while, hope they're ok.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brandon
It blows my mind how Fran refuses to target guards. He loves the slow lengthy kids but clearly guard play has been their weakness for years. Joe T is not good and neither is Ulis.
 
I don't understand why the Iowa media and fans are so high on Aaron Uhlis. He barely played last year but they think he is going to be a star.

Iowa fandom is high on everyone. You don't get to go to Iowa unless you are AA material. The process we are watching unfold in Iowa City right now is not about if anyone is good. They all are. This is the selection process of who get's to be the star, the center piece.

Obviously that will be Connor with Patrick as the understudy. The Uhlis talk is something Fran and staff propagated to not make it look like Connor was gifted the position.

But make no mistake, as Iowa's football season loses its shine (should be right after they visit Ames) you will see stories start to get published about the Connor, how he postponed baseball career, now it's his team, blah blah.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: ScottyP
St Thomas more. I’m not catholic, but know who st Thomas is but not St Thomas More.
You can google it, but he was Henry #8's chancellor and a devout Catholic. When Henry #8 invented the Anglican Church to OK his divorces, More didn't go along with it and was beheaded. That's pretty devout.

Not to be confused with St Thomas Aquinas. Or the OG St Thomas. Or St Thomas of Onalaska.
 
The superstars on the bench stayed there while the starters went for the big goose egg.
 
I don't understand why the Iowa media and fans are so high on Aaron Uhlis. He barely played last year but they think he is going to be a star.

If you are going to have hope, you have to have SOMETHING to believe in that is at least plausible.
 
Uhm, Hawkeye fans idea of athletic is different than most. To them when they say they have an athletic team, it tends to correlate to how many black players are on the court.
I seriously think they are like those people that define their teams as athletic with the baseline being 5 random students at the U of I, not a power conference basketball team.

When you use an average power conference team, you could say Joe T. is above average athletically, and whichever of Pat Mac or Murray that is playing the 4, you could MAYBE say they are above average athletically for a 4. Otherwise, relative to the typical power conference team they are very unathletic.

It is important to point out that the Big 10 as a whole was pretty unathletic as a whole. Illinois was completely overwhelming the conference athletically, both with their guard play and Cockburn. Then Loyola has no problem with their quickness. It doesn't mean the teams weren't good, but even their good teams - Michigan, Iowa, Wisconsin, Purdue, were very underwhelming in terms of the number of explosive athletes they put on the court.
 
I prefer CyTwins use of 'Fat Kid' for number 5 lol. But then I am old enough to remember the days when Victor Alexander played for the Clones, he wasn't exactly skinny but had a great touch and could score and played for a while in the NBA if i recall correctly, but 'Fat Kid' makes me laugh, my apologies to any fat kids out there.
A while was 6 years and $6.5 million. And that was 20-30 years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Acylum

Help Support Us

Become a patron