Yea, the Big10 West. I just said that. Thanks for repointing that outWe all know who the Sun Belt is better than.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yea, the Big10 West. I just said that. Thanks for repointing that outWe all know who the Sun Belt is better than.
Not being black helps him a ton...at Iowa.If he doesn't improve he will get benched. KF is stubborn like a lot of coaches, but Iowa needs Petras to be better than he has and he will get benched if he doesn't improve.
Lombardi is so bad lol. I don't mean to be rude, but does anyone else even think he is a D1 QB for any other team? I've watched 3 of his games now and I can't believe he got a scholarshipYep, still not sold on him at all. Defense and ST's made that game a blowout and the ineptness of Lombardi.
Christensen was a lot more talented than Petras but I definitely see the comparison
That's a whole lot of meh outside of BanksI'm going back through the QBs in the KF tenure and really outside of Christenson and maybe Kyle McCann can't think of anyone else that truly deserved to be benched. Rudock was OK, but obviously CJB was more of a game changer so that could have been another one that should have happened sooner.
Iowa QBs by year under KF going back to 2001.
2001 - Kyle McCann (Brad Banks was the backup and very green so not sure if he was ready to be the full time starter yet).
2002 - Brad Banks
2003 - Nathan Chandler
2004-2006 - Drew Tate
2007 - Jake Christenson
2008 - Jake Christenson/Ricky Stanzi
2009-2010 - Ricky Stanzi
2011-2012 - James Vandenberg
2013-2014 - Jake Rudock
2015-2016 - CJB
2017-2019 - Stanley
He's got great size and that's about it. He's not P5 starter material at all.Lombardi is so bad lol. I don't mean to be rude, but does anyone else even think he is a D1 QB for any other team? I've watched 3 of his games now and I can't believe he got a scholarship
Do we really know Wisconsin is decent? They’ve played one game.The Big 10 west is not average. It's not even close to average. It is back to a massive pillow fight league. The only good team in that division is Wisconsin. I'm not sure any other team in that league would beat anybody but Baylor and Kansas. MAYBE Tech, but at least they have this thing called offense
We have no idea whether Wisconsin is good or not.. They played a putrid Illinois team and that's it.Do we really know Wisconsin is decent? They’ve played one game.
You can at least think that they are pretty good. They returned a fair amount from a good team.Do we really know Wisconsin is decent? They’ve played one game.
Let’s analyze Wisconsin in general. They usually do well because they play in the big ten west. They pile up the wins there and make the big ten championship where they quite often get prison raped by the East and then go play in a bowl against the 3-4 pick of another conference because the other conferences have teams in the playoffs. They are a decent team, but their schedule doesn’t tell you much.You can at least think that they are pretty good. They returned a fair amount from a good team.
There's a reason why neither in-state school offered him as a QB. He'd potentially be a really good LB.Lombardi is so bad lol. I don't mean to be rude, but does anyone else even think he is a D1 QB for any other team? I've watched 3 of his games now and I can't believe he got a scholarship
Let’s analyze Wisconsin in general. They usually do well because they play in the big ten west. They pile up the wins there and make the big ten championship where they quite often get prison raped by the East and then go play in a bowl against the 3-4 pick of another conference because the other conferences have teams in the playoffs. They are a decent team, but their schedule doesn’t tell you much.
Normally I would agree about the Big Ten West.Let’s analyze Wisconsin in general. They usually do well because they play in the big ten west. They pile up the wins there and make the big ten championship where they quite often get prison raped by the East and then go play in a bowl against the 3-4 pick of another conference because the other conferences have teams in the playoffs. They are a decent team, but their schedule doesn’t tell you much.
Since 2013 (when east/west started) Wisconsin is 0-3 in title games losing by an average of 28.Normally I would agree about the Big Ten West.
I don’t agree with this take.
Since 2013 (when east/west started) Wisconsin is 0-3 in title games losing by an average of 28.
Wisconsin may not be on the level of Ohio State, but they're certainly only one step below them. In 2017 they were a play away from beating tOSU and making the playoff. And because they don't have a name like Ohio State or Michigan, they're rarely overrated.Since 2013 (when east/west started) Wisconsin is 0-3 in title games losing by an average of 28.
That is what amazes me the most. There are not many programs that can plug in new coaches like that and sustain the type of success Wisconsin has.They've also won a Cotton Bowl, Orange Bowl and lost the Rose Bowl by 1 point last year. They are really good and a very solid program despite three coaching changes in the last 10 years.
That is what amazes me the most. There are not many programs that can plug in new coaches like that and sustain the type of success Wisconsin has.
That is what amazes me the most. There are not many programs that can plug in new coaches like that and sustain the type of success Wisconsin has.