
Iowa State Cyclones Scores, Stats and Highlights - ESPN
Visit ESPN for Iowa State Cyclones live scores, video highlights, and latest news. Find standings and the full 2025 season schedule.
Video of 4th down stop available here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is where things get into fuzzy interpretation. A running back plowing in to the line pf scrimmage gets boinked by multiple defense players, some helmet to helmet. No penalty.If the offensive guy is considered a runner at the point of contact, lowers their head that initiated the contact, they can be thrown for targeting. Doesn’t happen often but remember it happening twice last year in games I watched.
Still beyond a dumb ejection. The first one was justifiable as targeting. Young’s was not.Not in the first half of the OSU game...
The rule is way too punitive. Its ridiculous to kick a guy out of the game unless he is purposely head-hunting like Vontaze Burfict
Ya gotta disagree. Young turned his body so that his shoulder would hit. What is he supposed to do let him score a touchdown? They are both going full speed. Head to head contact was incidental.The rule has nothing to do with if the offensive player lowers his head or not. It was a target and is something that Young should correct.
This is exactly right.the WR shouldn’t have ducked his head down into young prior to getting hit. Had he not ducked, young’s hit would’ve been fine
The rule is still there to protect the offensive player who was defenseless. I can't find a replay anywhere, but from what I can recall, Young did make contact with his shoulder first, but he also lowered his head which is what the rule is trying to stop.Ya gotta disagree. Young turned his body so that his shoulder would hit. What is he supposed to do let him score a touchdown? They are both going full speed. Head to head contact was incidental.
I think Horne’s the play before was because it wasn’t with the crown of the helmet.The rule is still there to protect the offensive player who was defenseless. I can't find a replay anywhere, but from what I can recall, Young did make contact with his shoulder first, but he also lowered his head which is what the rule is trying to stop.
I 100% agree that in the full speed of a game this is easier said than done, and that there was zero intent by Young, but I think the rule was correctly interpreted. That being said, I was surprised the targeting a few plays before was waived off, which just proves the subjectivity of this rule is a mess and needs to be fixed, especially with a rule that has the consequences of this one.
The rule is still there to protect the offensive player who was defenseless. I can't find a replay anywhere, but from what I can recall, Young did make contact with his shoulder first, but he also lowered his head which is what the rule is trying to stop.
I 100% agree that in the full speed of a game this is easier said than done, and that there was zero intent by Young, but I think the rule was correctly interpreted. That being said, I was surprised the targeting a few plays before was waived off, which just proves the subjectivity of this rule is a mess and needs to be fixed, especially with a rule that has the consequences of this one.
Thanks !!![]()
Iowa State Cyclones Scores, Stats and Highlights - ESPN
Visit ESPN for Iowa State Cyclones live scores, video highlights, and latest news. Find standings and the full 2025 season schedule.www.espn.com
Video of 4th down stop available here.
This, If they really want to limit helmet to helmet collisions, offensive players need to have the same rules. If an offensive players lowers their head in to a collision, they get the same penalty. Virtually impossible for a defensive player to avoid that hit in real time without just not tackling.the WR shouldn’t have ducked his head down into young prior to getting hit. Had he not ducked, young’s hit would’ve been fine
This would solve so many problems is a great idea. Young MAYBE should of gotten ejected (based solely on how they seem to be policing the game, right or wrong). However, there’s not fair world where the kid can’t play half of the next game based on a football hit like that.I'd like to see football take the basketball approach to the flagrant 1 and flagrant 2. Seems to me now, that the rule has no nuance and there should be more levels of severity, not just a yes or no verdict.
Yes I agree that that needs to be fixed. What bothers me is that if the penalty occurs one second into the second half, or with just one second left in the second half, it carries over into the first half of the next game. They're definitely needed to be some latitude there.I said this in the game thread at the time, but I’m fine with the call. I’m fine with the ejection rule. But they’ve REALLY got to get rid of the ridiculous penalty of the carryover into the next game. It’s such a stupid and pointless rule and has such a drastic effect on a game that it shouldn’t. MAYBE you can implement it in a way like for repeat offenders, kind of like the NBA does with flagrant fouls.