They don't have Iowa St in it and that's funnyThen why do you careWhere they have Iowa State in it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They don't have Iowa St in it and that's funnyThen why do you careWhere they have Iowa State in it?
You want the polls to wait until mid November so the B1G teams have 3 games under their belt to rank them?
![]()
I don't really see why it matters. The SEC teams haven't played yet but are in the poll. It's just a poll and doesn't really matter until the end of the season anyway.
If you weren’t playing at first, wouldn’t you want to see protesting and actions against the decision?Big Ten parents and fans motto "Cry to Play".
Iowa's WRs are terribleThere's a thread on Iowa's 247 page that asserts Iowa has a top 2 WR room in the Big Ten....and people are in agreement with it. Iowa was 7th in the conference last year in passing yards per game. And that was with a senior QB tossing them ball. They had two receivers in the top 20 in the conference last season. I'm guessing it's because they're not used to using WR's as ball catchers.
Fair? Do I need to give you the same speech I give my kids? Sometimes life isn't fair and that includes football.Alabama will have 4 games under their belt before the B1G gets around to playing their first game. So by then, we'll know if the SEC teams are good or not. Will we know how good B1G teams are after playing one game compared to everyone else having played 5 or more games already? No. So it would not be fair to all the other teams that have been playing for a long time already.
An ISU fan has no room to talk after your debacle last Saturday.Iowa's WRs are terrible
Because these nerds think about ISU 24/7.Then why do you careWhere they have Iowa State in it?
One game sample size vs 20+ years of Ferentz having awful WRs. DerpAn ISU fan has no room to talk after your debacle last Saturday.
One game sample size vs 20+ years of Ferentz having awful WRs. Derp
If you weren’t playing at first, wouldn’t you want to see protesting and actions against the decision?
HOK doesn't even have a top 15 receiver in the Big 10There's a thread on Iowa's 247 page that asserts Iowa has a top 2 WR room in the Big Ten....and people are in agreement with it. Iowa was 7th in the conference last year in passing yards per game. And that was with a senior QB tossing them ball. They had two receivers in the top 20 in the conference last season. I'm guessing it's because they're not used to using WR's as ball catchers.
But you said it doesn’t matter until the end of the season. You clearly have a hard time understanding your own thought process.They don't have Iowa St in it and that's funny
Give it up CyTwins..... Iowa's WRs are WAY better than ours unfortunately. Their top 3 guys are a lot better than our top 3. It's not really that close.
I agree to a point. I should tell my kids to read some of your postings. Then explain to them that this is what they will become if they don’t focus on school and put too much of their life into a college sports team. It should scare them silly and keep them from ending up in my basement.Fair? Do I need to give you the same speech I give my kids? Sometimes life isn't fair and that includes football.
Milton is better than any WR on their roster. Milton had over 1100 yards in his first two seasons. ISM had 548 yards his first two seasons. Brandon Smith had 810 yards his first THREE seasons. You're an idiot
Who are their top 3 and our top 3?I was talking about comparing the top 3. Milton is the best WR on either team probably, although we don't throw to him anymore because CMC praised Hutch all offseason and so now he's the go to guy it appears.
But looking at Iowa's top 3 versus ISU's, Iowa has the advantage.