Most had Fields but whatever. The point is that the Heisman race has def changed.As shown, he wasn't. Many had him the favorite. And rightfully so. He will be the number 1 pick in this coming draft
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Most had Fields but whatever. The point is that the Heisman race has def changed.As shown, he wasn't. Many had him the favorite. And rightfully so. He will be the number 1 pick in this coming draft
You said Iowa has been right there with Wisconsin. So by your logic Iowa must be right on the cusp of being a top 10 team for the decadeAre you THAT dense?
I'm going with Keith Duncan. Had realistically about the same chance as Purdy.I think his point is which one of Iowa's players had Heisman odds let alone even in the discussion?
I'm going with Keith Duncan. Had realistically about the same chance as Purdy.
I did not say that. Where did I say that? I said Wisconsin has been better and there is little shame in that. Wisconsin has been better than most the last 10 years. It's no news flash. Oklahoma has been better than ISU. shocking!You said Iowa has been right there with Wisconsin. So by your logic Iowa must be right on the cusp of being a top 10 team for the decade
Funny because I really don't hate him at all. I think he seems like a good kid and he's a really good QB. Maybe would be a true Heisman contender if he was on a better team.Your hatred for Brock Purdy is weird
He's definitely eliteFunny because I really don't hate him at all. I think he seems like a good kid and he's a really good QB.
define elite? Top 5 in the Big 12? yes he isHe's definitely elite
define elite? Top 5 in the Big 12? yes he is
Ohio State>OklahomaWhat an awful take. Yikes
Ohio State>Oklahoma
Penn State>Texas
Michigan>Baylor
Wisconsin>Oklahoma State
Iowa>Iowa State
Minnesota<TCU
Michigan State>Texas Tech
Northwestern>Kansas State
Purdue>Kansas
Based on the tiers Big Ten>Big 12
I saw Northwestern over Kansas State and Iowa over Iowa State and didn't look at the rest. Lol yikes that's badHow would you change it?
Yet the Big 12 has no wins in the playoff despite being there more then the Big Ten.Since 2000 both the Big Ten and Big 12 have only won two each. Crazy to think about
I don’t see why it wouldn’t work that way. Iowa has played in better in the post season and has more wins then ISU. Northwestern is the same way.I saw Northwestern over Kansas State and Iowa over Iowa State and didn't look at the rest. Lol yikes that's bad
Than*Yet the Big 12 has no wins in the playoff despite being there more then the Big Ten.
William HIll had him at 60-1 in February.Purdy is around 60/1 about everywhere now. Was 100/1 before the two irrelevant conferences opted out
I don’t see why it wouldn’t work that way. Iowa has played in better in the post season and has more wins then ISU. Northwestern is the same way.
So for the first year in who knows when, ISU was going to be better then Iowa. Northwestern is better then K-State.AP voters thought Iowa State was going to be better than Iowa this year
Northwestern stinks
First time since 2017 yesSo for the first year in who knows when, ISU was going to be better then Iowa. Northwestern is better then K-State.