That is a MAJOR misconception. I receive no benefit from my oldest two on taxes, but since I provide shelter, clothing, housing and/or other basic necessities; they are ineligible to even claim themselves. They would need to find employment and show income to make that break. I was even going to have one of my companies hire my oldest to see if he could get some aid (can't even get stinking subsidized loans), but that wasn't even going to work. Are most of the athletes holding full or semi-full time jobs to show ability to provide for themselves? It's not just a simple decision to be broken off from being a dependent on from someone when you are in college. It has been kept that way to avoid kids filing for themselves and getting massive amounts of government support while someone is even partially helping them.
One biggie is/was health insurance. Was pretty easy to see if they person was independent or not by asking about if they had their own policy or not. Since Obamacare allowed a child to stay on a policy until 26 (or through, Im unsure there), that has taken than easy determinator away.
It is really starting to sound like Iowa is/was pulling some very illegal things if they had a lot of athletes in government housing.