Kirk Ferentz getting sued for being racist

Status
Not open for further replies.
The information within that article was blowing up. Do people really think they took it down for another reason than they were told / asked to do so?

And please save the "Ferentz would never do that" comments. Those days are over.

The University probably threatened to sue the owners for libel.
 
Why? Do you think he's a racist? Do you think he chose to ignore 40+ claims of his #2 man in charge for 20+ years? Do you think he knew anything?

I don’t think Ferentz knew. Several players have stated that they were not comfortable going to Ferentz to voice their concerns, and I know that some of this stuff was brought to black members of the leadership council, and even they didn’t bring it up to Ferentz. And it’s not like Doyle is going to voluntarily bring up some of the things he is accused of saying.

That in itself is an indictment on Ferentz and how he ran the program, that no one would feel comfortable bringing this stuff up to him personally, but I don’t think it is reason to fire him. I know they have taken steps over the last couple years to address the culture that made black players feel uncomfortable by loosening some of the restrictions, looking into why the attrition with black players was so high, hiring more black assistant coaches, etc. It’s clear that those moves weren’t a big enough step, and now this is going to force Kirk’s hand to make sure they do make the changes necessary.

Ultimately I think this will be a positive for the Iowa program. It will rid them of the one person that was almost universally cited as the source of the toxicity in Doyle, and it will allow Iowa to address the problems that needed to be addressed in a public and transparent manner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Waukee4Cy
Buckle up. Mother to black player who transferred out



You what is next right? The University of Iowa and their inflated ego of thinking they are more important and better than they actually are will shut down the internet in order to get this to go away.
 
I don’t think Ferentz knew. Several players have stated that they were not comfortable going to Ferentz to voice their concerns, and I know that some of this stuff was brought to black members of the leadership council, and even they didn’t bring it up to Ferentz. And it’s not like Doyle is going to voluntarily bring up some of the things he is accused of saying.

That in itself is an indictment on Ferentz and how he ran the program, that no one would feel comfortable bringing this stuff up to him personally, but I don’t think it is reason to fire him. I know they have taken steps over the last couple years to address the culture that made black players feel uncomfortable by loosening some of the restrictions, looking into why the attrition with black players was so high, hiring more black assistant coaches, etc. It’s clear that those moves weren’t a big enough step, and now this is going to force Kirk’s hand to make sure they do make the changes necessary.

Ultimately I think this will be a positive for the Iowa program. It will rid them of the one person that was almost universally cited as the source of the toxicity in Doyle, and it will allow Iowa to address the problems that needed to be addressed in a public and transparent manner.
I think this post is in good faith.. But there is NO WAY Kirk Ferentz did not know about any of this. There are accounts of players literally going into his office and him blaming that player instead of blaming Doyle..

And if Kirk didn't know this was going on and players were too scared to bring it up to him because they were afraid.. That's just as worse! Still though, Kirk knew.
 
I don’t think Ferentz knew. Several players have stated that they were not comfortable going to Ferentz to voice their concerns, and I know that some of this stuff was brought to black members of the leadership council, and even they didn’t bring it up to Ferentz. And it’s not like Doyle is going to voluntarily bring up some of the things he is accused of saying.

That in itself is an indictment on Ferentz and how he ran the program, that no one would feel comfortable bringing this stuff up to him personally, but I don’t think it is reason to fire him. I know they have taken steps over the last couple years to address the culture that made black players feel uncomfortable by loosening some of the restrictions, looking into why the attrition with black players was so high, hiring more black assistant coaches, etc. It’s clear that those moves weren’t a big enough step, and now this is going to force Kirk’s hand to make sure they do make the changes necessary.

Ultimately I think this will be a positive for the Iowa program. It will rid them of the one person that was almost universally cited as the source of the toxicity in Doyle, and it will allow Iowa to address the problems that needed to be addressed in a public and transparent manner.

So you think 20 years of creating a culture of racism and ONLY doing anything about it because they got caught finally is a positive for the program?
 
Can anyone remember any comment from Barta on this so far? If this was ISU, JP would be taking charge and not just letting the old white football coach self investigate and report. Barta has to be

Steve+S.jpg

That's because KF is Barta's boss, not the other way around. You wonder why Barta wasn't fired when he had to pay off that lawsuit? Because KF didn't want him fired. When all the hawkeye fans are complaining about the nonconference FB schedule and playing ISU every year...it's because KF wants it that way. Has nothing to do with Barta. KF is the boss and I really doubt he even has to answer to the university president.
 
If anyone can spin how Barta isn't a complete trainwreck at his job, he or she should be the highest paid PR person in the country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: erinmd32
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron