Not going to let you get away with changing the subject. Yes or no, is Sam LaPorta better than Chase Allen?
All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition
- Thread starter YeahBuddy
- Start date
Not going to let you get away with changing the subject. Yes or no, is Sam LaPorta better than Chase Allen?
So what about Big 10 teams and some of their unbelievable offenses.. Rutgers and Northwestern threw 6 and 7 passing touchdowns the entire year. But yeah lets just chalk that up to great defenses right?
Sure because I'm assuming PFF says so and if that's the case yes your starting TE is better than our backup TE lol
How can you accurately even assess what level both Fant and Hockenson are for NFL players when they both just finished their rookie season? Cause if that's all you have to go off of, the one season, then they are both busts after how they played. Absolute trash numbers. But yea, continue putting them on a pedestal. They haven't earned anything in the NFL yet to even remotely put them in the top 5 current TE's on NFL teams. Heck maybe not even the top 10
Thanks for sharing. I didn't know Kolar was so much better than Fant. Looks like the NFL for him after this season for sure.
Yeah, they played against 2 really bad offenses, like ISU played against some really bad defenses: ULM #128, Tech #127, Kansas #122.
I just hope he didn't cost himself top 20 draft pick money by coming back. Hopefully CMC doesn't cost this kid millions.
Illinois was #115 and and Miami OH was #122 offensively as well but yes. Iowa State plays a bunch of good offenses and a few good defenses throughout the year. Are the offenses good because most of the defenses are not? Maybe, it probably has a little bit to do with that.
Iowa plays a bunch of good defenses and a few good offenses throughout the year. Are the defenses good because most of the offenses are not? Maybe, it probably has a little bit to do with that.
Moral of the story here is each conference has a specialty. There are a couple of teams that fit into both categories and some who fit in neither. Our conferences are different from one another and that's not necessarily a bad thing.
Is yours the one that had Stanley ahead of Purdy? Because I highly doubt people are accepting that.
Because you guys deflect from mostly average results with what an nfl factory you are.
with as many players as you put in the pros, average results of 7-5 should be unacceptable. Especially when you realize that 5 of those years Make up the vast majority of the success.
While you guys lose your **** to each other on how you should be Bama light, since your a nationally relevant program and all, you come here to seek approval and validation from your betters.
the nfl thing has devolved into a coping mechanism for largely mediocre to average results.
I mean all these schools that are putting as many guys in the league as Iowa has, certainly have won a lot more games. And since you’re here for all the hawk talk you guys perpetuate, you would think you’d actually be much more esteemed than you are. Instead you’re a conference lackey clinging to others successes as validation of how great you are, when you rarely ever play any of the teams you try to associate yourselves with.
If you think averaging over 8 wins a year over the last 19 years is "average" I don't think you understand college football. That puts Iowa in the top 20 of all P5 teams over that time.