Anyone know if ND can come in this late and be a player in the Bollers sweepstakes?
Unless Stanford offers, he's staying in-state.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone know if ND can come in this late and be a player in the Bollers sweepstakes?
Iowa's 247 guys have him to WisconsinUnless Stanford offers, he's staying in-state.
They have not spoken to the people I have. He is ISU's to lose.Iowa's 247 guys have him to Wisconsin
Not overly impressed with Gach. Seen him play in high school. Better hope for Smith.
Slovis was 3-3 for 76 yards in the 2nd half before getting injured. He was in for one drive in the second half in which a TD was scored. He got knocked out of the game two offensive plays later lol. Him and USC's offense literally scored within the first minute and 31 seconds of getting the ball to start the half.
Whatever, the DL was abusing their OL and Slovis still had 260 yards, 2 TD's, and a completion percentage of 73%. He was balling out and Iowa ruined USC's chances. Again, not arguing here that Iowa wouldn't have won, but to think Iowa had "figured out Slovis" or they were going to run away with the game regardless doesn't make too much sense as to how the game was going at that period of time.We didn't need to send the house, our DL was abusing their OL.
I absolutely completely forgot that each game mimics the other and because Iowa was able to stop Iowa State in September they were about to do the exact same thing against USC in January. You're correct.Yeah Slovis completed a bomb in the 2nd half, so what? ISU competed a bomb to start the 2nd half vs Iowa to go up 14 to 6, how did Purdy do after that play?
To act like since Slovis made a throw that he is gonna now bomb it all over Iowa's defense is a Twins argument. You are better than that.
I wonder if Illinois and DePaul "checked all the boxes" at one point as well?
I wonder if Illinois and DePaul "checked all the boxes" at one point as well?
Those guys haven't commited, so not sure what you mean.No. I was told that you guys were going to get some big time recruits and your average was going to be similar to Iowa's:
https://cyclonefanatic.com/forum/threads/iowa-football-recruiting.218752/page-1937#post-7162708
That sparked the question - who are you guys going to get that's any good. You responded with:
Players I feel that ISU is likely to has a great chance of landing.
Mitchell Evans (TE)
Jaylin Noel (WR)
Aden Kelley (DT)
Players who I think they will be in the running for until the end:
TJ Bollers (DE)
Micah Pettus (OL)
Kyree Young (RB)
Marcus Mbow (OL)
Looks like you're out on Kelley, Pettus, Mbow and Young. Guessing CMC will drop the ball with Bollers and Evans and possibly get Noel... So back to my original point. This class is a big old turd for CMC. Twedt broke him!
He has got to be one of the few players in NCAA history that is going to play the same opponent while suiting up for 3 different teams.
Don't play with my heart like this...They have not spoken to the people I have. He is ISU's to lose.
I doubt it. Many players go to 3 different schools nowadays
Maybe he'll go for 4 before all is said and done?He has got to be one of the few players in NCAA history that is going to play the same opponent while suiting up for 3 different teams.
I absolutely completely forgot that each game mimics the other and because Iowa was able to stop Iowa State in September they were about to do the exact same thing against USC in January. You're correct.
I'm stating that if you are going to base the effectiveness of the recruiting of a school such that it's a knock to have a low commit to top 5 ratio, Bama would be pretty freaking low on your list. As well as Georgia, Penn State, Ohio State, USC and so forth.Hold on, now you guys want to talk football?
Whatever, the DL was abusing their OL and Slovis still had 260 yards, 2 TD's, and a completion percentage of 73%. He was balling out and Iowa ruined USC's chances. Again, not arguing here that Iowa wouldn't have won, but to think Iowa had "figured out Slovis" or they were going to run away with the game regardless doesn't make too much sense as to how the game was going at that period of time.
You and some of the other guys said that you had figured out Slovis and therefore you were on your way to blowing out USC regardless of his injury. How had you already figured him out if he was 3 for 3 with 76 yards before getting injured? I'm not saying he was going to blow out Iowa or put up super human numbers. I'm genuinely asking how you figured him out?Common @Statefan10 this is ridiculous. I pointed out that Slovis played really well in the first half and USC managed 17 points. Then you try to make the case because Slovis completed a bomb in the 2nd half that somehow he was going to be even more superhuman in the second half and lead USC to 33 or more points in the 2nd half?
It is ridiculous, and it is a Twins troll it is beneath you.