Teams
Forum List
Toggle sidebar

All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition

Statefan10 said:
Purdy is faster than Stanley.. Lol
Click to expand...

I wouldn’t be so sure of that. More elusive and nimble, no question. But I wouldn’t have much confidence that Purdy runs faster than a 4.81 forty. As I said, if it is faster, it won’t be by much.
 
Gonzo said:
I never said you couldn't. If you thought Purdy was/is the better QB, good for you. I think Stanley was/is better, not because he won more games, but because he didn't fold at critical moments of big games the way Purdy did. That's a pretty big red flag. And it's not like I'm making it up, even the NFL scout identified that as the biggest problem with Purdy's game in his analysis. He may very well get over that hump this season, it wouldn't surprise me, he's a good QB. We'll see.
Click to expand...


Yeah he was clutch against penn st, and Michigan, and Wisconsin.

I can see why you guy will take a huge step back next year.
 
Brodie0 said:
I wouldn’t be so sure of that. More elusive and nimble, no question. But I wouldn’t have much confidence that Purdy runs faster than a 4.81 forty. As I said, if it is faster, it won’t be by much.
Click to expand...

Purdy is mobile. Stanley is immobile. What is happening here?
 
mitchforcy said:
Anyone who thought Stanley was a first round pick at any point is a moron.
Click to expand...
Well yeah
benjimill said:
Glad we could clear that up. So in summary, McShay watched a ton of tape over the summer and concluded that both Stanley and Fant are first round talents.
Click to expand...
SilverBack said:
Stanley isn't leaving early, but if I wanted to speculate as you're doing I could reference the first round projection that Todd McShay had for Stanley too...
Click to expand...
 
Gonzo said:
I never said you couldn't. If you thought Purdy was/is the better QB, good for you. I think Stanley was/is better, not because he won more games, but because he didn't fold at critical moments of big games the way Purdy did. That's a pretty big red flag. And it's not like I'm making it up, even the NFL scout identified that as the biggest problem with Purdy's game in his analysis. He may very well get over that hump this season, it wouldn't surprise me, he's a good QB. We'll see.
Click to expand...
If Stanley is so clutch in big games, why did he never lead his team to winning the Big 10 west is super weak (minus last year)? Heck, he never even beat Wisconsin!
2017 in the big games: he lost to Wisconsin, penn state, Michigan state, northwestern, and won Ohio state.
2018: lost to Wisconsin and penn state, won Mississippi state (that’s a stretch for a “big game”)
2019: lost to penn state, lost to Wisconsin, lost to Michigan, won Minnesota.

In big games he was 1-3, 1-2, and 1-3. But yea, keep acting like he is some major clutch player
 
Last edited:
Brodie0 said:
I wouldn’t be so sure of that. More elusive and nimble, no question. But I wouldn’t have much confidence that Purdy runs faster than a 4.81 forty. As I said, if it is faster, it won’t be by much.
Click to expand...
What’s your definition of “by much”? Cause I imagine he runs around a 4.65-4.7 which by forty time stands is ALOT faster
 
SouthernCy said:
If Stanley is so clutch in big games, why did he never lead his team to winning the Big 10 west is super weak (minus last year)? Heck, he never even beat Wisconsin!
2017 in the big games: he lost to Wisconsin fairly handy, got smashed by Florida and Penn State, won Michigan which was AT HOME
2018: lost to Wisconsin and penn state, won Mississippi state (that’s a stretch for a “big game”)
2019: lost to penn state, lost to Wisconsin, lost to Michigan, won Minnesota.

In big games he was 1-3, 1-2, and 1-3. But yea, keep acting like he is some major clutch player
Click to expand...
HospitableThinDunlin-size_restricted.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Help Support Us

Become a patron
Top Bottom
Back