Coronavirus Coronavirus: In-Iowa General Discussion (Not Limited)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are we going to arrest people who don't stay home if Reynolds gives the order to "shelter in place"? Some governors are threatening jail time. What confuses me is the fact they are letting people out of prisons and jails. WTF????
 
Her worrying about unemployment would be a "reason" wouldn't it? I certainly think that's valid reasoning as to why she doesn't want to do this. I also think that other governors have probably thought about that same effect from all of this and still made the decision.

I wasn't saying for whatever reason because I believe she's just doing this to mess with our heads. She obviously has her reasoning and that's why I said "for whatever reason".
What happens when the alcoholics can't get their medicine? When the riots and looting start, the liquor stores are usually hit hard. Might as well leave them open. Also, that might be why they're still selling guns and ammo. Probably wouldn't hurt to have a little home defense. I mean, with Reynolds making decisions we're headed for Mad Max and Walking Dead type **** am I right? :eek:
one of you will have to switch avatars.
 
What happens when the alcoholics can't get their medicine?

This is the real reason the liquor stores are 'essential'. Last thing you want to do when the hospital system is already overburdened is send a bunch of alcoholics into withdrawal and have them end up at the hospital, using resources we don't have enough of already.
 
Bunch of the same today in press conference

albert-einstein.jpg
 
Took the kids to a local hiking spot that usually has no one at it. About 10 minutes down the trail a group of 8 or so teenagers come running down the path panting playing tag. One fat girl stops 2 feet from us and starts to cough like she's out of breath.

I couldn't control myself and shouted "you have got it be ******* kidding me right now. MOVE!"

We went straight to the car and drove home.

Did you get called a Boomer?
 
Her worrying about unemployment would be a "reason" wouldn't it? I certainly think that's valid reasoning as to why she doesn't want to do this. I also think that other governors have probably thought about that same effect from all of this and still made the decision.

I wasn't saying for whatever reason because I believe she's just doing this to mess with our heads. She obviously has her reasoning and that's why I said "for whatever reason".
She is worried about her economic numbers. Plain and simple.
 
It's almost humorous at this point honestly lol.

On some level I sympathize. There isn't always going to be a lot to say.

Then I stop sympathizing when I hear questions like, "The CDC says up to 25% of coronavirus cases may be asymptomatic, out there spreading this and not realizing it. How does your plan account for those people?" only to be followed with answers like, "If you're sick, stay home."

This goes on every day.
 
A long time ago I (apparently) signed up to receive updates from the Legislative Service Agency. They've been in overdrive the past several days pushing out updates on many, many topics. Here's the email description from one I got today (with the title COVID-19 -- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Forecase.)
Document type: Fiscal Update Article
Document title: Education Departments and Agencies — COVID-19 Response: March 31, 2020
Document published location: https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/publications/BL/1133652.pdf
Some interesting content here, if you like methods, modeling, data, those sorts of things....
 
Last edited:
On some level I sympathize. There isn't always going to be a lot to say.

Then I stop sympathizing when I hear questions like, "The CDC says up to 25% of coronavirus cases may be asymptomatic, out there spreading this and not realizing it. How does your plan account for those people?" only to be followed with answers like, "If you're sick, stay home."

This goes on every day.
Yeah I honestly understand her stance in all of this. She's thinking about the economy and the negative effects of possibly enforcing more drastic measures. I get that. But holy cow, do a better job of answering the direct questions. Her answer about the asymptomatic carriers was awful I thought. "Practice social distancing." So essentially, "do your best to not infect people around you."
 
Yeah I honestly understand her stance in all of this. She's thinking about the economy and the negative effects of possibly enforcing more drastic measures. I get that. But holy cow, do a better job of answering the direct questions. Her answer about the asymptomatic carriers was awful I thought. "Practice social distancing." So essentially, "do your best to not infect people around you."
Remember, she also has media/communication people "guiding" her words. I sometimes think I see her wanting to say something and then realizing that, no, if she says that, this other awful thing will happen, and so she says nothing new. I do not envy her, that's for sure.
 
Have we reached a point where daily press briefings aren't necessary, unless there are drastic changes/updates?

Keep sending out the numbers report, but maybe start having these 2 or 3 times a week.
 
Have we reached a point where daily press briefings aren't necessary, unless there are drastic changes/updates?

Keep sending out the numbers report, but maybe start having these 2 or 3 times a week.

Then people will say she’s not considering it important. Too many people wanting to make this political. She can just keep them rolling so if something happens every press will be there.
 
Remember, she also has media/communication people "guiding" her words. I sometimes think I see her wanting to say something and then realizing that, no, if she says that, this other awful thing will happen, and so she says nothing new. I do not envy her, that's for sure.

A lot of journalists are wanting to do the Chris Matthews gotcha style. Best to not say anymore than you need to in politics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron