Coronavirus Coronavirus: In-Iowa General Discussion (Not Limited)

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's too strong....are there likely more cases than those that have been confirmed? Absolutely, but if you ignore the data we have that means we are only guessing. Use the current data, and work very, VERY hard to quickly get better, more accurate data and amend recommendations as that data becomes available.

Using data from 2-3 months ago would have been more sufficient in not having to work nearly as hard to help this situation.

But we know how that went.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RealisticCy
https://bringmethenews.com/minnesot...minnesota-schools-to-close-starting-wednesday

Schools just turned into daycares in MN for the above at least through March 27th. Most schools have spring break the week of March 23rd.

Planning document for e-learning in MN will roll out today at 10am to the schools.

---

They have also stopped all group meetings above 250. Smaller meetings as well if the facility cannot support social distancing of 6ft.

My son's district announced they will be closed Monday and Tuesday to facilitate distance learning planning.
 
If we want to stop the spread of this........ then yes.... all schools should be closed. That's what is obvious. But you need to put plans in place for this to be able to happen, but it seems other states are doing it, so not sure why we can't?

But Reynolds is just plain idiotic to state we'll think about closing a school when we have a case there. That's way too late. And how are you going to find out you have a case at your school when nobody can get tested?

Our entire country needs to be doing more than we are, but we're too greedy and spoiled to do it.

There is a point where "doing more" can cause more harm than good. No one knows what that point is. That's why it's not as simple as "shut everything down".
 
Correct answer. We have no idea whatsoever how many people already have this virus.... none. And all of these people that have it, but have no idea they have it, are just spreading it around to everyone else.... that's why you don't wait until you have confirmed cases to do something about it.

If everyone in your community had been tested, and there weren't any positive cases, then maybe you could still have school.... but that isn't even close to the world we're living in right now.

Your opinion is the entire state should close schools right now - when would you propose we re-open them?
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: jwtcyclone
This will be a critical week for the rural schools across the state. Unlike the urban schools, that are on spring break, many rural schools are still on the Easter break schedule.
If cases across the state stay flat, we will continue to go, if they spike this week, then we will be closing them down. It could go either way, I know I at my school, around 50% of the kids have internet access at home, difficult, but not impossible to do distance learning. Plus like many rural schools, we are above 50% for free and reduced lunch, if they cancel school we are going to have to come up with a way to get lunch out to those students.

We are just starting this pandemic, here in the US, its going to get a lot worse before its gets better in my opinion.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BigCyFan
There is no good answer to a lot of these situations.

Sally is single parent that’s a nurse.
Is Sally’s kid Mary going to spread it to her mom?
If Mary’s school is cancelled, Sally can’t work
If Sally can’t work, she can’t pay the bills.
If Sally can’t work, the hospital will be understaffed.

Maybe they should make school optional until this is cleared up. Kind of like my work “if you’re prepared to work from home, we want you to until further notice”. My guess is that about 10% of our workforce will actually show up.

I saw schools around here prior to shutdown were considering relaxing absenteeism rules for kids especially with higher risk family members
 
Facts are that while they’re have not yet been as many reported cases in that age group, to base a point on reported cases from a segment with the fewest tests is poor logic. The research and medical field is not yet sure just how big, but that age group is probably helping to spread the virus, largely facilitated from the logic you’ve employed.

Hopefully we don’t need to go over the role non-residential schools packed with kids during the day have in spreading viruses and diseases. In regards to societal spread, it potentially have been better if they did show signs, and had some level of mortality rate, as then we’d treat them as the conduits they likely are.


I see you should be heading up the task force instead of any the personnel that is. You apparently know more facts than they do. I'm going off what has been given to us and reported, you are throwing your own opinions in there as facts. So please email Reynolds and offer your expertise on the Cornonavirus to her since you know more about it than those guiding her, the mayor of NY and most other government agencies out there. I'm following what the reports are telling us, I'm not going to chastise those you don't follow what I THINK should happen.


Also, your first sentence is not a fact, it is an opinino.
 
I see you should be heading up the task force instead of any the personnel that is. You apparently know more facts than they do. I'm going off what has been given to us and reported, you are throwing your own opinions in there as facts. So please email Reynolds and offer your expertise on the Cornonavirus to her since you know more about it than those guiding her, the mayor of NY and most other government agencies out there. I'm following what the reports are telling us, I'm not going to chastise those you don't follow what I THINK should happen.


Also, your first sentence is not a fact, it is an opinino.

So your position is that people can take at face value that the reported confirmed cases is the entirety of the spread of coronavirus? And we should be making decisions based on that number alone?
 
So your position is that people can take at face value that the reported confirmed cases is the entirety of the spread of coronavirus? And we should be making decisions based on that number alone?


Nope, but you can try to mince words if you want to. I'm saying the the CDC knows more than any of us, but if you think you are more informed than them, go ahead and tell us how they are wrong. They present their best reports on what we need and should do with the information they have. Too many times people are drinking the rumor mill kool-aid and feeding it at the same time.

Do you go to the Doctor and if they tell you that meds won't support whatever illness you have, go out on the black market and get some meds instead? I go by the experts reports. Sometimes they are wrong, but they are right more times than the laypeople are who are feeding the rumor mill.
 
August? According to the governor of a state that's actually taking this seriously that is a possibility.

https://www.axios.com/ohio-governor-coronavirus-schools-8c9b3f18-4a76-449b-bb1d-f19b3b6f3542.html

What if there are still cases in Iowa in August? How do you justify opening schools then? If you're wanting to close schools now, I don't see how you open them for another year. There's going to always be someone in Iowa that's been diagnosed until a vaccine is ready.
 
What if there are still cases in Iowa in August? How do you justify opening schools then? If you're wanting to close schools now, I don't see how you open them for another year. There's going to always be someone in Iowa that's been diagnosed until a vaccine is ready.

Exactly - if the stance is zero tolerance on the front end it likely needs to be that way on the back end too, and that just isn’t realistic.
 
Didn't realize that we had so many infectious disease experts on CF. o_O

The amazing thing is it seems to be the same people who portray themselves as experts in all subject matters that pop up on CF. Truly modern day geniuses
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron