Teams
Forum List
Toggle sidebar

All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition

Legend Hawk said:
True Fr. TE for Iowa. Didn't even really start getting quality playing time until the Wisconsin game. In 5 games he had 15 catches and 188 yards. Pretty impressive a Fr can leap frog 3 other RS JR or older TE at TE U.
Click to expand...

LaPorta has been very impressive.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hawkmi
Legend Hawk said:
Goodson is a good blocker, he wouldn't get on the field at Iowa if he wasn't. Hall is a stud, I agree with you there.
Click to expand...

OK let's just say Goodson is as good as blocker as Hall which is probably generous. Hall is a better runner and WAY better receiver
 
How about a little 2020 preview. A lot of good young players for ISU, and obviously this assumes Wirfs and Epenesa leaving early.

QB - Purdy
RB- Hall
TE- Kolar
WR - Milton
WR - ISM
WR - Smith
OL- Jackson
OL- Downing
OL - Linderbaum
OL - Newell
OL - Iowa ?

DL- Bailey
DL - Uwazurike
DL - Gholston
DL- Petersen
LB- Rose
LB- Vance
LB- Colbert
CB- Hankins
CB- Johnson
S- Stone
S- Eisworth
 
  • Like
Reactions: CyberJJJ and Hawkmi
CyTwins said:
Yeah I'm not sure why this is so complicated to some
Click to expand...

I don't know why it is so complicated either. Hall got more opportunity this year than Goodson did. Hall had 50 more carries than Goodson did, and if you give Goodson 50 more carries this year, and give him the playing time Hall had, they would have nearly identical stats.

Hall had a better year, hall is a stud. Goodson had a good year, Goodson is a stud.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: CyTwins
He's not on the list but I actually think Ragaini ran some nice routes in San Diego and overall had a better year than I anticipated him having.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hawkmi
TheJackWePack5 said:
How about a little 2020 preview. A lot of good young players for ISU, and obviously this assumes Wirfs and Epenesa leaving early.

QB - Purdy
RB- Hall
TE- Kolar
WR - Milton
WR - ISM
WR - Smith
OL- Jackson
OL- Downing
OL - Linderbaum
OL - Newell
OL - Iowa ?

DL- Bailey
DL - Uwazurike
DL - Gholston
DL- Petersen
LB- Rose
LB- Vance
LB- Colbert
CB- Hankins
CB- Johnson
S- Stone
S- Eisworth
Click to expand...
I would probably plug in Cole Banwart in at one of the OL spots and maybe make a case for Nixon as one of the DL because I think he is going to be a stud next year. Probably put LaPorta in as the 2nd TE well because I'm an Iowa fan but other than that looks pretty spot on.
 
TheJackWePack5 said:
How about a little 2020 preview. A lot of good young players for ISU, and obviously this assumes Wirfs and Epenesa leaving early.

QB - Purdy
RB- Hall
TE- Kolar
WR - Milton
WR - ISM
WR - Smith
OL- Jackson
OL- Downing
OL - Linderbaum
OL - Newell
OL - Iowa ?

DL- Bailey
DL - Uwazurike
DL - Gholston
DL- Petersen
LB- Rose
LB- Vance
LB- Colbert
CB- Hankins
CB- Johnson
S- Stone
S- Eisworth
Click to expand...

This looks pretty accurate IMO
 
Legend Hawk said:
I don't know why it is so complicated either. Hall got more opportunity this year than Goodson did. Hall had 50 more carries than Goodson did, and if you give Goodson 50 more carries this year, and give him the playing time Hall had, they would have nearly identical stats.

Hall had a better year, hall is a stud. Goodson had a good year, Goodson is a stud.
Click to expand...
You're going to just keep going around and around so you might as well stop.
And if you're saying opportunities matter that much it makes last year's Brock vs Nate debate even worse.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: CyTwins
Legend Hawk said:
True Fr. TE for Iowa. Didn't even really start getting quality playing time until the Wisconsin game. In 5 games he had 15 catches and 188 yards. Pretty impressive a Fr can leap frog 3 other RS JR or older TE at TE U.
Click to expand...
Far to small body of work. We don't know what he will do next year without Stanley.
 
Hawkmi said:
I would probably plug in Cole Banwart in at one of the OL spots and maybe make a case for Nixon as one of the DL because I think he is going to be a stud next year. Probably put LaPorta in as the 2nd TE well because I'm an Iowa fan but other than that looks pretty spot on.
Click to expand...

Lots of unknowns for your offense next year. That Oregon State kid could come out and be worse than Stanley (if that's possible) or he could come out looking like the next Lawrence/Purdy
 
CyTwins said:
Lots of unknowns for your offense next year. That Oregon State kid could come out and be worse than Stanley (if that's possible) or he could come out looking like the next Lawrence/Purdy
Click to expand...
Stanley and Wirfs are pretty much all Iowa is going to lose on offense. Losing a 3 year starter at QB is hard but it will be exciting to watch the QB battle this spring and fall. You can bag on Petras all you want,(Oregon State) but the kid beat all of Jarrod Goff's high school records in CA and threw for 50 TD's to only 2 INT's in his senior year. The kids got some talent so lets see how it translates to the college game. With the talent Iowa has at WR returning it's going to be a fun season next year for this Hawkeye fan.
 
  • Agree
  • Funny
Reactions: breck53 and CyTwins
Hawkmi said:
Stanley and Wirfs are pretty much all Iowa is going to lose on offense. Losing a 3 year starter at QB is hard but it will be exciting to watch the QB battle this spring and fall. You can bag on Petras all you want,(Oregon State) but the kid beat all of Jarrod Goff's high school records in CA and threw for 50 TD's to only 2 INT's in his senior year. The kids got some talent so lets see how it translates to the college game. With the talent Iowa has at WR returning it's going to be a fun season next year for this Hawkeye fan.
Click to expand...
I feel like Brian called a good game and did some unique plays. Look, Nate had some good stats and racked up a lot of wins but with just a little bit of mobility at QB there could be a lot more games like the SC one.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hawkmi and Shawker
Hawkmi said:
Stanley and Wirfs are pretty much all Iowa is going to lose on offense. Losing a 3 year starter at QB is hard but it will be exciting to watch the QB battle this spring and fall. You can bag on Petras all you want,(Oregon State) but the kid beat all of Jarrod Goff's high school records in CA and threw for 50 TD's to only 2 INT's in his senior year. The kids got some talent so lets see how it translates to the college game. With the talent Iowa has at WR returning it's going to be a fun season next year for this Hawkeye fan.
Click to expand...

If you want to look at High School stats to justify a recruit you must think that Hogan kid sucks
 
  • Useful
Reactions: Hawkmi
Hawkmi said:
I would probably plug in Cole Banwart in at one of the OL spots and maybe make a case for Nixon as one of the DL because I think he is going to be a stud next year. Probably put LaPorta in as the 2nd TE well because I'm an Iowa fan but other than that looks pretty spot on.
Click to expand...
That is true on Nixon. He’d likely be in there on the interior, forgot about him.

Iowa does potentially lose quite a bit on the DL it seems.
 
Hawkmi said:
Stanley and Wirfs are pretty much all Iowa is going to lose on offense. Losing a 3 year starter at QB is hard but it will be exciting to watch the QB battle this spring and fall. You can bag on Petras all you want,(Oregon State) but the kid beat all of Jarrod Goff's high school records in CA and threw for 50 TD's to only 2 INT's in his senior year. The kids got some talent so lets see how it translates to the college game. With the talent Iowa has at WR returning it's going to be a fun season next year for this Hawkeye fan.
Click to expand...

If talking about who a school beat out to get a player is "bagging" on them I bag on Purdy all the time
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Help Support Us

Become a patron
Top Bottom