Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You think ISU didn't throw the ball down field because they didn't trust Purdy? Lol
I'm sure we'll see a lot of 3 step drops.I’m sure the inadequacy of the offensive line plays a big part in that too.
I’m sure the inadequacy of the offensive line plays a big part in that too.
Probably true.I’m sure the inadequacy of the offensive line plays a big part in that too.
This will be arguably the best defense Stanley will see all year. For sure the best front 7
Luckily we don't see a good DL until conference play
I'm thinking Michigan and Wisconsin will both have better front 7s and maybe PSU as well.
Lol no
Oh I forgot, you have final say on this stuff. LOL
The game plan against Drake was probably thrown out the window and then determined by the weather and field conditions.Not if Iowa State follows the same game plan they did against Drake. We’ll see if they trust Purdy to throw the ball downfield against Iowa.
The game plan against Drake was probably thrown out the window and then determined by the weather and field conditions.
So what are you betting? How much?You also want the over on clones scoring 13 pts?
Yes we're 100% going to follow the same game plan as Drake against a ranked Iowa team. No doubt.Not if Iowa State follows the same game plan they did against Drake. We’ll see if they trust Purdy to throw the ball downfield against Iowa.
Yes we're 100% going to follow the same game plan as Drake against a ranked Iowa team. No doubt.
No the point is that you're saying that Brock's performance wasn't good when in fact he played well and consistent against a good FCS opponent. You're making fun of his 146.2 rating when that's better than 50% of all games Nate Stanley has played.So he performed better against an FCS defense than Stanley did in half of all his games?
Is that impressive or whats your point?
No the point is that you're saying that Brock's performance wasn't good when in fact he played well and consistent against a good FCS opponent. You're making fun of his 146.2 rating when that's better than 50% of all games Nate Stanley has played.