You do realize, as bad as Minnesota's and Nebraska's defenses were last year, they were better than a majority of the Big 12, right?
You’re really ******* stupid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You do realize, as bad as Minnesota's and Nebraska's defenses were last year, they were better than a majority of the Big 12, right?
They outscored opponents 48.4-33.3 and over 40% of those opponents didn't even make a bowl game...Oklahoma - 60
Minnesota - 25
I honestly don't think it's much of an exaggeration.
Minnesota's defense was good enough to slow down anybody by the end of last season.They outscored opponents 48.4-33.3 and over 40% of those opponents didn't even make a bowl game...
Minnesota's defense was good enough to slow down anybody by the end of last season.
Minnesota's defense was good enough to slow down anybody by the end of last season.
You're my favorite person here!You’re really ******* stupid.
Oklahoma scored over 50 points seven times last year. They scored over 60 two times. No one in the Big 10 has faced an offense like OU has had the past 3 years, and will continue to have under Lincoln Riley.They outscored opponents 48.4-33.3 and over 40% of those opponents didn't even make a bowl game...
Ah yes, the stellar offenses of Wisconsin (one dimensional), Illinois (garbage program), Purdue (very hit or miss), and Georgia Tech (one dimensional). Those teams are incredibly tough to stop.Minnesota's defense was good enough to slow down anybody by the end of last season.
Their average margin of victory was 15 points. To just assume that they'd outpace that by 3 touchdowns is an exaggeration. Sorry, buddy.Oklahoma scored over 50 points seven times last year. They scored over 60 two times. No one in the Big 10 has faced an offense like OU has had the past 3 years, and will continue to have under Lincoln Riley.
.
You're the one saying Minnesota and Nebraska could hang with OU last year, not me.Their average margin of victory was 15 points. To just assume that they'd outpace that by 3 touchdowns is an exaggeration. Sorry, buddy.
Show me where I said anything even remotely close to that. Dump out your Big 12 Kool-Aid.You're the one saying Minnesota and Nebraska could hang with OU last year, not me.
I mean we could talk about the fact a Big 10 team hasn't scored a point in the CFP since 2014. Great offenses on display there.Show me where I said anything even remotely close to that. Dump out your Big 12 Kool-Aid.
Yeah - because that's relevant in showing me where I said anything close to "Minnesota and Nebraska could hang with OU last year."I mean we could talk about the fact a Big 10 team hasn't scored a point in the CFP since 2014. Great offenses on display there.
I guess I got the username's wrong. It was the guy who said Minnesota could've slowed anyone down towards the end of the season. My bad.Yeah - because that's relevant in showing me where I said anything close to "Minnesota and Nebraska could hang with OU last year."
Who was the last QB for Iowa to have a passing efficiency that high? I'll give you a hint: no one
You're my favorite person here!
Better put that one on a banner and hang it.
You seem mad Purdy is a better QB than anyone you guys have ever had. I mean Fat Stanley is going to go down as the greatest QB in the history of Iowa football. Yikes!
Delusional. Absolutely delusion. A QB that has started 9 games. Who has seven interceptions compared with 16 TD's. Is better than Brad Banks, Heisman runner up. Chuck Long, Heisman runner up. Randy Duncan, who played well enough to be the first overall NFL draft pick. You’re delusional. Brad Banks in 2002 had 26 TD and only 5 interceptions. Delusional.
Yeah - because that's relevant in showing me where I said anything close to "Minnesota and Nebraska could hang with OU last year."
The bus 4 wheel drive setup? What kind of clearance does it have?If Stanley has a bad game against us, I can bet a lot of Iowa fans will throw him under the bus.