It's great that there are 15 ISU players on his all Big XII team, but isn't the big takeaway that he has ISU as his #4 surprise team and two of his power ratings have ISU going 11-1. I mean... holy ****!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah but I read they ranked our OL #35 in the country so...It's great that there are 15 ISU players on his all Big XII team, but isn't the big takeaway that he has ISU as his #4 surprise team and two of his power ratings have ISU going 11-1. I mean... holy ****!
Yeah but I read they ranked our OL #35 in the country so...
Yeah but I read they ranked our OL #35 in the country so...
Yeah but I read they ranked our OL #35 in the country so...
The largest national pundit in college football gives Iowa State the highest praise it's received in its entire 125 year history.
Seriously he thinks we've got a shot to go 11-1.
I'd take that hands down.
Please no... I'm in diabetic shock.We're going to need more kool-aid
A lot more kool-aid
I don't think it needs to be a "sizable step" at all. Just start the season close to where they ended last season - not a big ask with five returning starters running the same scheme/assignments as last year - and we'll be a much better team. I don't think we got physically beat last year be anyone but our focus and execution were bad at points. That stuff should be much more settled. I don't expect individuals to be miles better than they were last year but it will be a much more cohesive unit, greater than the sum of its parts.I think that the OL is getting some love (Lindy's has them in the top 10 in the country) just because they are returning all five starters. Anyone who actually watched them last year would not rate them very high. Although, they did start playing well at the end of the season. They dominated the bowl game minus those false starts. IMO they need to take a sizeable step forward to be in the top half of the conference. And our season success depends on them doing that.
I think that the OL is getting some love (Lindy's has them in the top 10 in the country) just because they are returning all five starters. Anyone who actually watched them last year would not rate them very high. Although, they did start playing well at the end of the season. They dominated the bowl game minus those false starts. IMO they need to take a sizeable step forward to be in the top half of the conference. And our season success depends on them doing that.
Meyer wasn't terrible. I will agree though that he wasn't a 'special' player.Lost in all of this is that appears we have a viable, certified talent at QB for the first time since Seneca Wallace. That is what is growing the eggplant for me. And don’t come at me with Bret Meyer/Austin arnaud bros. They weren’t anything special.
Absolutely, Meyer and Arnaud had padded stats but were never really that good. Purdy is a really good talent and for him to perform as he did as a true freshman was great. I was made fun of in the first round pick thread when I said.....hes got a legit shot by his Junior/Senior year to be considered in the first round. Its not hard to see itLost in all of this is that appears we have a viable, certified talent at QB for the first time since Seneca Wallace. That is what is growing the eggplant for me. And don’t come at me with Bret Meyer/Austin arnaud bros. They weren’t anything special.
Yeah but I read they ranked our OL #35 in the country so...