Property Tax Increase

You would rather have your investment lose or not gain value?
I was just referring to the taxes, if you're not selling any time soon you're just paying higher taxes. Luckily I'm selling my rental property this year so I'll profit nicely but for a lot of others that is not the case.
 
In this case, yes. All it does is cause inflation. Every house goes up, every sale price goes up. The only benefit is for the city/county, but we will pay more for every future house purchase because of this.
There differences between assessed value, taxable value, and tax levy rate.

Also, if you want to get rid of inflation, be my guest. How would you do that?
 
If you consider your residence an investment, you need to reconsider your investments. I don't even list it as an asset except for lenders who want to know everything and not listing it would be considered a violation.
Maybe you need to reconsider your investments.
 
Nice one. Residences aren't investments. Real estate agents like to push this flawed angle. Unless you rent out part of it, it's not an investment.

Your home should NOT be thought of as an investment. That very rarely is the case and can lead to bad situations.
 
They were talking about this on WHO on my way in this morning. Property tax revenue should be capped and not tied to market values. Towns get WAY to reliant on ever increasing budgets and expect that to go on forever.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: CP44 and Remo Gaggi
It just goes to remind us that we don't really own our property. Just try to not pay your property taxes and see what happens. I don't thing there is a county in the United States that doesn't have some sort of property tax. It's for the children!
 
They were talking about this on WHO on my way in this morning. Property tax revenue should be capped and not tied to market values. Towns get WAY to reliant on ever increasing budgets and expect that to go on forever.
100% they should be capped, but that would eliminate our city or town taking advantage of us though. We just cant have that if the elected officials want to continue to spend, spend and spend some more.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Remo Gaggi
See the next post. That is the requirement but it often LAGS far behind market values in places that see real price gains in the market values. They have rules to follow that causes the values to not reflect the market for some time.
Complex crazy stuff

The Iowa Department of Revenue is responsible for “equalizing” assessments every two years. Following is a general explanation of the purpose of equalization.

The Department compares the assessors' abstracts to a “sales assessment ratio study” it has completed independently of the assessors. If the assessment (by property class) is 5% or more above or below the sales ratio study, the Department increases or decreases the assessment. (There is no sales ratio study for agricultural and industrial property.)

Equalization occurs on an entire class of property, not on individual property. Also, equalization occurs on an assessing jurisdiction basis, not on a statewide basis.

Equalization is important because it helps maintain equitable assessments among classes of property and among assessing jurisdictions. This contributes to a more fair distribution of state aid, such as aid to schools. It also helps to equally distribute the total tax burden within the area.
 
WTF.

Mine is up 21k over last year and 54k since 2015. This is a 12% increase over one year and a 35% increase over 4 years.
 
Complex crazy stuff

The Iowa Department of Revenue is responsible for “equalizing” assessments every two years. Following is a general explanation of the purpose of equalization.

The Department compares the assessors' abstracts to a “sales assessment ratio study” it has completed independently of the assessors. If the assessment (by property class) is 5% or more above or below the sales ratio study, the Department increases or decreases the assessment. (There is no sales ratio study for agricultural and industrial property.)

Equalization occurs on an entire class of property, not on individual property. Also, equalization occurs on an assessing jurisdiction basis, not on a statewide basis.

Equalization is important because it helps maintain equitable assessments among classes of property and among assessing jurisdictions. This contributes to a more fair distribution of state aid, such as aid to schools. It also helps to equally distribute the total tax burden within the area.

I know what they say about it and a few of the rules they work under. However, the whole system is broken. I guess the State has never heard the term Location, Location, Location when it comes to Real Estate. Increases in Des Moines are a heck of a lot different than they are in many of the Rural areas. One number for the entire state is dumb to say the least.
 
Holy crap....well good thing that those fools who voted for the sales tax increase are helping you out

Not sure how the previous owners kept it so low but it looks like we're eating this one again this year. It's in line with what our house is worth, maybe even a little low so I guess I can't complain too much.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: NWICY
Not sure how the previous owners kept it so low but it looks like we're eating this one again this year. It's in line with what our house is worth, maybe even a little low so I guess I can't complain too much.
For now...hopefully it doesn't go up too much more.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron