I guess Iowa's collapse will start in March this year...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Iowa might not collapse this year, purely due to playing the garbage of the Big 10 at the end of the year.

They still have Rutgers (twice), Ohio State, Indiana (twice), Northwestern, Nebraska
 
Iowa might not collapse this year, purely due to playing the garbage of the Big 10 at the end of the year.

They still have Rutgers (twice), Ohio State, Indiana (twice), Northwestern, Nebraska
Indiana is horribly spiraling down too. Iowa needs to take advantage of it.
 
Iowa might not collapse this year, purely due to playing the garbage of the Big 10 at the end of the year.

They still have Rutgers (twice), Ohio State, Indiana (twice), Northwestern, Nebraska
Which doesn’t help build an ncaa tourney resume
 
You could say the same thing about the Big XII as a whole. According to KenPom and NET, there isn’t much difference between Iowa State, Kansas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Purdue, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Maryland.
I’m not going to debate which conference is better, because they are fairly similar. But why hasn’t iowa beaten any of the top tier teams in the Big 10? Obviously they still have some chances to do that, but I don’t think anyone expects them to grab a win against a Michigan. Iowa’s resume right now isn’t great. They have lots of work to do.
 
I’m not going to debate which conference is better, because they are fairly similar. But why hasn’t iowa beaten any of the top tier teams in the Big 10? Obviously they still have some chances to do that, but I don’t think anyone expects them to grab a win against a Michigan. Iowa’s resume right now isn’t great. They have lots of work to do.

Iowa played well enough to win against Wisconsin and Michigan State, and in both games couldn’t buy a shot from the perimeter. Games like that happen when you rely heavily on three point shots, unfortunately.

Disagree with your assertion that Iowa has a lot of work to do. Right now they are a solid 6/7 seed. They have 8 Q1/Q2 wins, which is way better than most teams in that seed range, let alone teams that are considered on the bubble. If Iowa gets to 21 wins (5 more), they are a lock for the Tournament- regardless of who those wins come against. 20 wins probably gets them into the Tournament too.
 
Iowa played well enough to win against Wisconsin and Michigan State, and in both games couldn’t buy a shot from the perimeter. Games like that happen when you rely heavily on three point shots, unfortunately.

Disagree with your assertion that Iowa has a lot of work to do. Right now they are a solid 6/7 seed. They have 8 Q1/Q2 wins, which is way better than most teams in that seed range, let alone teams that are considered on the bubble. If Iowa gets to 21 wins (5 more), they are a lock for the Tournament- regardless of who those wins come against. 20 wins probably gets them into the Tournament too.

Jack Hoiberg played in the Michigan St game...
 
Iowa played well enough to win against Wisconsin and Michigan State, and in both games couldn’t buy a shot from the perimeter. Games like that happen when you rely heavily on three point shots, unfortunately.

Disagree with your assertion that Iowa has a lot of work to do. Right now they are a solid 6/7 seed. They have 8 Q1/Q2 wins, which is way better than most teams in that seed range, let alone teams that are considered on the bubble. If Iowa gets to 21 wins (5 more), they are a lock for the Tournament- regardless of who those wins come against. 20 wins probably gets them into the Tournament too.
If beating bottom feeders of the conference with barely any key wins gets you into the tourney, then we need a new selection committee. I don’t want to toot our own horn here, but Iowa State is Iowa’s best win this year. Oregon may not even be an nit team. UConn is trash. One decent win shouldn’t get anyone in(basing it off if Iowa doesn’t pick up any key wins the rest of the way)
 
Iowa played well enough to win against Wisconsin and Michigan State, and in both games couldn’t buy a shot from the perimeter. Games like that happen when you rely heavily on three point shots, unfortunately.

Disagree with your assertion that Iowa has a lot of work to do. Right now they are a solid 6/7 seed. They have 8 Q1/Q2 wins, which is way better than most teams in that seed range, let alone teams that are considered on the bubble. If Iowa gets to 21 wins (5 more), they are a lock for the Tournament- regardless of who those wins come against. 20 wins probably gets them into the Tournament too.
Michigan State blew your asses out at home.
 
If beating bottom feeders of the conference with barely any key wins gets you into the tourney, then we need a new selection committee. I don’t want to toot our own horn here, but Iowa State is Iowa’s best win this year. Oregon may not even be an nit team. UConn is trash. One decent win shouldn’t get anyone in(basing it off if Iowa doesn’t pick up any key wins the rest of the way)

Iowa has the same number of Q1 wins as Iowa State, more Q2 wins, and has played a more difficult strength of schedule. If you think Iowa “has work to do”, then so too does Iowa State. Just because you don’t think wins against Nebraska or Ohio State should count for anything, that does not mean the committee views things the same way.
 
  • Funny
  • Disagree
Reactions: flycy and LLCoolCY
Iowa has the same number of Q1 wins as Iowa State, more Q2 wins, and has played a more difficult strength of schedule. If you think Iowa “has work to do”, then so too does Iowa State. Just because you don’t think wins against Nebraska or Ohio State should count for anything, that does not mean the committee views things the same way.
Which is why I said maybe we need a new committee.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron