Teams
Forum List
Toggle sidebar

Iowa Football Recruiting

dexterhawk said:
Pollsters thought you guys squeeked out a win against Duke.....so the polls are a little off.
Click to expand...

You’re seriously as dumb as any of benji’s alts.

Pretty typical insecure hawk fan. You should feel bad, you may have enough self awareness to realize the level of ignorance required to be benj. You may not, though, it’s looking like that’s a distinct possibility too.
 
And to the whole Brock fiasco, or whatever you want to call it, Iowa would have taken him and Goodson if they knew someone was going to leave the program. It is what it is, Brock was Iowa bound and was told to commit or his spot was gone. Well, someone else took it first. It is all in the Goodson article on rivals.com
 
Thinker said:
And to the whole Brock fiasco, or whatever you want to call it, Iowa would have taken him and Goodson if they knew someone was going to leave the program. It is what it is, Brock was Iowa bound and was told to commit or his spot was gone. Well, someone else took it first. It is all in the Goodson article on rivals.com
Click to expand...

Well that was really stupid
 
  • Funny
Reactions: Rural
Thinker said:
All ISU has on Iowa is Transitive, since Iowa beat them head to head, if that is the game you want to play.
Click to expand...
operation.gif
 
CyTwins said:
Well that was really stupid
Click to expand...

It is questionable, yes, but they took Sargent instead. And as you have stated he is decent but has no burst for an RB. Brock might be a guy that does, but for what Iowa is doing offensively the last 4-5 years is RB by committee. I do not like the strategy, but it is what we are doing right now. Goodson is a different back than what we already have. Brock is in the mold of Geil, but is more well rounded than him.
 
Thinker said:
It is questionable, yes, but they took Sargent instead. And as you have stated he is decent but has no burst for an RB. Brock might be a guy that does, but for what Iowa is doing offensively the last 4-5 years is RB by committee. I do not like the strategy, but it is what we are doing right now. Goodson is a different back than what we already have. Brock is in the mold of Geil, but is more well rounded than him.
Click to expand...

Montgomery is a solid back but Sargent had a higher YPC against tougher defenses. As good as ISU fans think Montgomery is, his stats are pretty underwhelming.
 
  • Funny
  • Agree
Reactions: JP4CY, Cyrocks, jmkc12 and 5 others
Needless to say, Brock is a very good RB. I would have loved for Iowa to have him. But I also really like Goodson, and he looks very good too. Both teams did well at the RB position.

As I say that watch Breece and Byrd be the ones to emerge from both schools.
 
SilverBack said:
Montgomery is a solid back but Sargent had a higher YPC against tougher defenses. As good as ISU fans think Montgomery is, his stats are pretty underwhelming.
Click to expand...

Stop it, I am a huge Iowa fan, but Monty is the best rb in the state the last 2 years, even better than Wadley. It is no contest. I firmly believe Monty is a NFL back and will be for years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Help Support Us

Become a patron
Top Bottom