Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't see Miles as being able to get the talent that he could at LSU or OSU, Kileman has shown the ability to identify talent outside of 3+ star recruitsThey are both pretty good imo. No idea why miles wanted anything to do with that dumpster fire, but we'll see if it pans out.
I think it depends on what you consider better. Kleinman was hired to win ball games and maintain what Snyder built. Miles was hired for his name in the hopes the media attention will build some hype and get donors and fans involved in the program. Two completely different agendas.
Who made the better hire for their respective institutions?
I went with the KSU hire, because KU has already tried to hire a "proven winner" couple times in the last decade, with disastrous results. Think they are still paying for a those guys plus Beaty.
Still don't know if the KSU hire is a great one. It will take a couple years to see the results. What he does in terms of assistant coaches will determine how fast a start he gets.
Klieman for me and its not close. Miles may win and he will also leave at the drop of a hat. Klieman is a good coach, he wins and is willing to stay. For places like us, ku and kstate - not the most desirable places on the football map - wanting to stay is a big thing for me. If your goal is success every 20 years, keep hiring miles, chizik, and charlie weiss. For sustained success, go hire campbell, klieman, snyderetc. and hope you hit on one.
Sometimes, even the CF staff can say smart things.I'll go with neither. I hope they are both disastrous picks.