Who made the better hire KU or KSU?

Who made the better hire KU or KSU

  • KU with miles

    Votes: 34 13.5%
  • KSU with klieman

    Votes: 218 86.5%

  • Total voters
    252

EvilBetty

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2012
1,361
1,474
113
They are both pretty good imo. No idea why miles wanted anything to do with that dumpster fire, but we'll see if it pans out.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: aobie
I don't think Les Miles is a good hire, so this one is easy. Kansas IMO needs a young gun in the same vein as Campbell to do anything. That said, it is Kansas.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JBone84
I think it depends on what you consider better. Kleinman was hired to win ball games and maintain what Snyder built. Miles was hired for his name in the hopes the media attention will build some hype and get donors and fans involved in the program. Two completely different agendas.
 
I think it depends on what you consider better. Kleinman was hired to win ball games and maintain what Snyder built. Miles was hired for his name in the hopes the media attention will build some hype and get donors and fans involved in the program. Two completely different agendas.

Who made the better hire for their respective institutions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: heitclone
I think as far as an initial, win the press conference thing it is Miles. But I don't know if either will have great success at their schools.
 
Klieman for me and its not close. Miles may win and he will also leave at the drop of a hat. Klieman is a good coach, he wins and is willing to stay. For places like us, ku and kstate - not the most desirable places on the football map - wanting to stay is a big thing for me. If your goal is success every 20 years, keep hiring miles, chizik, and charlie weiss. For sustained success, go hire campbell, klieman, snyderetc. and hope you hit on one.
 
Who made the better hire for their respective institutions?

Easily Kleinman, Miles is a short term hire, I won't go as far as calling him a solution. He's too old to be there very long, it's like KU is preparing to make the job better for the guy that replaces him in 3 years.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cyfanatic
I went with the KSU hire, because KU has already tried to hire a "proven winner" couple times in the last decade, with disastrous results. Think they are still paying for a those guys plus Beaty.

Still don't know if the KSU hire is a great one. It will take a couple years to see the results. What he does in terms of assistant coaches will determine how fast a start he gets.
 
[QUOTE="Halincandenza, post: 6438012, member: 39959"]I think as far as an initial, win the press conference thing it is Miles. But I don't know if either will have great success at their schools.[/QUOTE]

You must have missed all the videos of his press conference.
 
Given KU's options, I'll go with them. Getting any kind of name associated with that program is a good thing for them. They will have recruits at least look at them that would have never considered them in the past. KU's expectations are gonna be much lower as well.

KSU better hope they don't start losing to KU in football or their fans will lose their minds. I'm not a drama-loving guy whatsoever, but both schools having new coaches is gonna make sports radio fun next fall.

I do think KSU got the better coach (at this point in their respective careers anyway)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cyfanatic
I went with the KSU hire, because KU has already tried to hire a "proven winner" couple times in the last decade, with disastrous results. Think they are still paying for a those guys plus Beaty.

Still don't know if the KSU hire is a great one. It will take a couple years to see the results. What he does in terms of assistant coaches will determine how fast a start he gets.

Except they haven't hired a proven power 5 winner. They hired Weis who was a coordinator and then the Buffalo coach and then another coordinator. This is the first coach that they have hired that I can remember who is a successful power 5 coach.
 
Klieman for me and its not close. Miles may win and he will also leave at the drop of a hat. Klieman is a good coach, he wins and is willing to stay. For places like us, ku and kstate - not the most desirable places on the football map - wanting to stay is a big thing for me. If your goal is success every 20 years, keep hiring miles, chizik, and charlie weiss. For sustained success, go hire campbell, klieman, snyderetc. and hope you hit on one.

Miles has had sustained success as a power 5 head coach. That is way different than Chizik or Weiss.
 
I'll go with neither. I hope they are both disastrous picks.
Sometimes, even the CF staff can say smart things.
EuphoricRichAzurewingedmagpie-small.gif
 
Miles must not be as good of a coach as I always thought if he sat out a year and came back to coach Kansas. Going with a big name doesn't equal success at a school like Kansas, just look at Illinois to see how their season just went under Lovie. Klienman certainly seems like the type of guy that could follow the same recipe for success that Snyder did, but I'm not convinced he's a wizard yet. With CMC, I'm unafraid of any big 12 offseason hires.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyfan21

Help Support Us

Become a patron