I don't think you understand what I'm saying. I've said on here that Iowa is the better team right now. They beat ISU and are ranked higher. I then said that if history holds true though, ISU will be the better team by the end of the season as ISU usually gets better during the season and Iowa doesn't. I believe that will hold true this year as well, especially since ISU is missing 2 starters, with one of them being their best player, and 2 others just returned and are not up to speed yet.
As for football, I'm consistent with what I'm saying about basketball. Iowa was the better football team when they beat ISU, and were probably ranked higher at that point too. But as the season went on, ISU improved and Iowa basically leveled out, and ISU finished the season ranked and Iowa wasn't, so yes ISU ended the season as the better football team.
All very consistent logic. So I don't get where you keep using the term "using clonedude logic"?
Isu ended the season with a punch less loss to Texas, and barely scraped by bowless Baylor and ksu and then won a nail biter against non scholarship drake.