That’s what the opponent-adjusted efficiency ratings are for.
So Parker faced MUCH easier offenses this year than Heacock?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s what the opponent-adjusted efficiency ratings are for.
So Parker faced MUCH easier offenses this year than Heacock?
What game did Butler lose for Iowa State?
I’d love to.Iowa State played 4 teams ranked 87th or worse in defensive efficiency, and that doesn’t include their match-up against non-scholarship FCS program Drake. Not sure that’s a road you really want to go down.
The 2017 Iowa game
I’d love to.
Let’s look at rush defense.
First off, I have never seen anybody reference "football outsiders" so thank you for that, I suppose.S&P+ rush defenses:
Kansas - 82
Baylor - 83
WVU - 86
Oklahoma St- 95
Kansas St - 104
Did that go the way you thought it was going to? Nope.
First off, I have never seen anybody reference "football outsiders" so thank you for that, I suppose.
How about this?
Indiana - 74
Maryland - 84
Minnesota - 101
Nebraska - 109
Illinois - 125
Now, how about some statistics that 99.99% of football analysts would actually use? NCAA Total Rush Defense
Wisconsin - 57
Purdue - 67
Penn St - 71
Minnesota - 76
Maryland - 85
Nebraska - 96
Illinois - 122
Please again, tell me how tough those Big Ten defenses were.
Total rush defense? What is this, 2006? You still judge pitchers off their ERA, don’t you?
So you remember an Iowa State player dropping a pass in 2017 but don't remember your RB losing a fumble in a conference game this year? I guess Bohannon knows what he's talking about
Just an FYI Kakert said Jacobs is getting his scholarship pulled if he takes an official visit to Ohio State
He's a good back. 4.9 ypc 9 TD's....Sargent is not good. Is this serious?
ISU 27 Iowa 34Iowa State played a tougher schedule than Iowa. That is an indisputable fact. Is this real life?
He's a good back. 4.9 ypc 9 TD's....
ISU 27 Iowa 34
Congrats?
https://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/ranking/schedule-strength-by-other
What's he have to do with anything?Mark Weisman was good too I assume?
What's he have to do with anything?
Saying Sargent isn't a good back is just silly. He's not better than Montgomery but he's a good back and his stats back that up.
FYI he had a better per carry and per reception avg than Montgomery.....once again, not saying he's better than Montgomery....just pointing out that saying he isn't "good" is just idiotic.
SOS rankings...click the link. Unless you think Georgia is #1 in "team rankings"....at the end of the link it say's "schedule strength".Team rankings? Lol