Purdy>>>>Rodgers
That's a better debate than Purdy and Stanley actually
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Purdy>>>>Rodgers
With Mabin in there of course he will. Too bad the 49ers threw that pick to put Mabin in that spot
NopeYou do realize that making this argument really points out how mediocre Kirk has been, especially when you consider the dog **** schedule he’s been blessed to play the vast majority of his years there, right?
I didn't even know the guy went to Iowa until my friend (Iowa fan) I was discussing the game with let me know. My Iowa buddy pretty much said the same thing the Iowa fan tweeted in my initial response.
Just imagine if whatever ISU CB you placed in your all-iowa team ahead of Mabin (who isn't in the NFL) was out there instead. Rodgers wouldn't have needed a last minute drive to win, that's for sure.
No one seems to piss and moan in this forum more than you. They make an ‘unsubscribe’ feature for a reason.Jesus which retread on their 17th screen name is this loser?
Iowa has more players in the NFL than any B12 team and 16th most overall so when discussing NFL players there's a decent chance he went to Iowa.
You do realize that making this argument really points out how mediocre Kirk has been, especially when you consider the dog **** schedule he’s been blessed to play the vast majority of his years there, right?
You were wrong and put one on a tee for us. Better luck next time, Buddy
Greg Mabin was terrible when he played for Iowa and two years later he's a starting corner in the NFL.
Wrong about what?
Kirk went 12-2 and finished in the top 10 with most of those players last night.
Oh now AP votes matter again
Guess you were half right. My bad.
19th
So now you want to use AP votes? Just trying to be clear so we can be consistent.
so how long are you going to be back now YeahBuddy or Purpledick or whatever your previous screen names were?That was a bad joke considering how long it took you to get there and it still had to involve you editing my quote. Not your best.
define long timeIsn't that what I've been using for a long time now?