All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition

So you would rather have Hornibrook over Haskins, that is crazy.

Haskins is younger and I've only seen him play once. I've only seen Hornibrook play once this year and he shredded your weak back 7 so I'm not informed enough to pick on that
 
Haskins is younger and I've only seen him play once. I've only seen Hornibrook play once this year and he shredded your weak back 7 so I'm not informed enough to pick on that

At least you gotten past using straight PFF ratings to determine who has more talent. Maybe there is hope for you yet.
 
So you think Jake Rudock was a more talented college QB than Brad Banks? Yes or no?

I've answered the question the way I will answer it. Putting up eye popping numbers in college doesn't tell you who is a better player. The team you are on, and the players around you matter.
 
I've answered the question the way I will answer it. Putting up eye popping numbers in college doesn't tell you who is a better player. The team you are on, and the players around you matter. Not all players have the luxury of playing with future NFL players all around them.

It's literally a simple yes or no question and you won't answer it. Do you think Jake Rudock was a more talented college QB than Brad Banks? Yes or no?

My answer is no, I think Brad Banks was more talented. Waiting on yours
 
It's literally a simple yes or no question and you won't answer it. Do you think Jake Rudock was a more talented college QB than Brad Banks? Yes or no?

My answer is no, I think Brad Banks was more talented. Waiting on yours

I'm still waiting on answers from you that I asked first. It was a simple question as well.
 
It's literally a simple yes or no question and you won't answer it. Do you think Jake Rudock was a more talented college QB than Brad Banks? Yes or no?

My answer is no, I think Brad Banks was more talented. Waiting on yours

Banks was very talented but he was raw and short. Heard he wasn't good at reading defenses and that most plays only called for one or two options and if those weren't open run or throw the ball away. Ruduck was a much more polished QB, but was in an awful offensive system under Davis.
 
  • Creative
Reactions: CyTwins
Banks was very talented but he was raw and short. Heard he wasn't good at reading defenses and that most plays only called for one or two options and if those weren't open run or throw the ball away. Ruduck was a much more polished QB, but was in an awful offensive system under Davis.

Yeah, I'm not sure what points @CyTwins thinks he is scoring by obsessing over Banks. As I said literally 4 Iowa QB's after Banks (Tate, Stanzi, Ruddock and CJ) could have put up better numbers as Sr. on that 2002 offense than what Banks did.

No other QB in Ferentz history got to play on as talented a team as that 2002 team. It was loaded up with NFL talent.
 
  • Disagree
  • Funny
Reactions: Rural and CyTwins
Agreed the first 2 weeks of the season he was very MEH. The good news for Iowa fans is that he has been trending upwards ever since.
He had some good passes and some floaters. Indiana's secondary was garbage and if all they did was turn their head around they had a chance at some of those.
TE's looked outstanding to me. Funny that they were talking about Fant's availability and minutes and then he makes a good TD sliding down catch.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron