Biggest disadvantage in the CyHawk Series since 1980

[benjimill]

I'm glad you like Iowa's, I like ISU's.

That’s fine. We’re on an ISU website, I would expect you to be a homer.

 

[Legend Hawk]

I actually disagree. From a "number of players drafted" standpoint, I think Iowa players get more benefit of the doubt because they are one of a handful of schools left that still run a pro style offense. This is exactly why the so called experts are so high on Stanley. Don't get me wrong, Iowa has had some really good players come through the system but there are a lot of good ones that never even get a shot. Iowa absolutely benefits from the system they run.

Iowa’s system can also hurt them. Taveon Smith ran like a sub 4.4, but just didn’t put up enough number in Iowa system to get his name on teams radar. Riley McCarron ran a sub 4.4 as well, same thing for him.

So maybe it helps the QB, it has hurt other positions, heck take CB as well. Iowa’s zone system kept King and Jackson from being drafted higher IMO as well.

 

[Legend Hawk]

So you think Rudock was a better college QB than Banks. That's incredibly dumb but hey you're entitled to your opinion

I would say a QB in the Heisman hunt > Stanley, even if Stanley goes pro. Kempt isn’t going to be in the Heisman hunt. Plus if Kempt was on Iowa, he would backup Stanley, and if Stanley were at ISU Kempt would also back up Stanley there as well.

 

[CyTwins]

I would say a QB in the Heisman hunt > Stanley, even if Stanley goes pro.

Move those goalposts!

 

[CyTwins]

Iowa > RB - Montgomery is the best RB clearly, but as a group, Iowa's top 3 > ISU.

Never forget

 

[Legend Hawk]

Move those goalposts!

I’m not the one who brought a player from nearly 20 years ago into the discussion about Kempt and Stanley.

 

[CyTwins]

I’m not the one who brought a player from nearly 20 years ago into the discussion about Kempt and Stanley.

I'm not the one who brought up the NFL when discussing which college football player was better

 

[Legend Hawk]

Never forget

I think Iowa can run for more yards than Montgomery. I could see Iowa rushing for 160 and Montgomery for 120. So that would make Iowa RB > ISU RB.

 

[herbicide]

I would say a QB in the Heisman hunt > Stanley, even if Stanley goes pro. Kempt isn’t going to be in the Heisman hunt. Plus if Kempt was on Iowa, he would backup Stanley, and if Stanley were at ISU Kempt would also back up Stanley there as well.

Not if you are basing that on last years stats... Campbell has an extremely low tolerance for fumbles.

 

[CyTwins]

I think Iowa can run for more yards than Montgomery. I could see Iowa rushing for 160 and Montgomery for 120. So that would make Iowa RB > ISU RB.

There are so many things wrong with this post I don't even know where to start

 

[CyTwins]

Not if you are basing that on last years stats... Campbell has an extremely low tolerance for fumbles.

Stats don't matter for comparing QB's, they only matter when you compare 3 RB's to 1 RB

 

[JP4CY]

That’s fine. We’re on an ISU website, I would expect you to be a homer.

I'm an ISU homer because I like our D Line more than Iowa's?

What's your old usernames, lets verify you're not a homer.

 

[BCClone]

I assume this is a typo and you meant to say amazing or something? There are a lot of adjectives you could use to describe Montgomery; blazing is not one of them.

He said montgomery is not blazing. Learn to read.

 

[benjimill]

He said montgomery is not blazing. Learn to read.

You might want to take some of your own advice, genius.

 

[CyCrazy]

I think Iowa can run for more yards than Montgomery. I could see Iowa rushing for 160 and Montgomery for 120. So that would make Iowa RB > ISU RB.

This is some awesome logic. jfc

 

[Bigman38]

Would have thought Stanley throwing for 47% and 1 pick against a MAC team would have humbled some of the fans that think the QB comparison is close. How many years does he need to put up worse numbers in every category before he's worse than Kempt?

 

[CyTwins]

Would have thought Stanley throwing for 47% and 1 pick against a MAC team would have humbled some of the fans that think the comparison is close

Don't forget he fumbled and only threw for 108 yards too

 

[BCClone]

You might want to take some of your own advice, genius.

He said the hawk backs were strong and not blazing which is what montgomery is. Strong and not blazing. Really tough there.

 

[benjimill]

I'm an ISU homer because I like our D Line more than Iowa's?

What's your old usernames, lets verify you're not a homer.

Yes, thinking ISU has a better DL makes you a homer. Iowa has the best player on either line (A. Nelson), the most talented player on either line (AJE), and more proven depth than Iowa State.

 

[BCClone]

Yes, thinking ISU has a better DL makes you a homer. Iowa has the best player on either line (A. Nelson), the most talented player on either line (AJE), and more proven depth than Iowa State.

Pull your head out of the sand and at least look at who and what we have. Your statement makes me think you started that other account as a back up troll account its so bad.