Ferentz's Emphasis on the ISU Game

Don't bother.

They seem to struggle with the meaning of "good." Everything was "good" or "great" with the offense last year, sans the WRs. Yet somehow their offensive metrics were near bottom of P5 and even BCS...

Iowa was actually 40th in offensive points per possession and 42nd in opponent adjusted offensive efficiency. Not great, but not bad for a first year OC and QB and a very young receiving group, not to mention two freshman OTs.
 
Iowa was actually 40th in offensive points per possession and 42nd in opponent adjusted offensive efficiency. Not great, but not bad for a first year OC and QB and a very young receiving group, not to mention two freshman OTs.
Probably because of how mobile Nate is.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: CyTwins
Iowa was actually 40th in offensive points per possession and 42nd in opponent adjusted offensive efficiency. Not great, but not bad for a first year OC and QB and a very young receiving group, not to mention two freshman OTs.
Cherry picked stats of course. Never mind the traditional metrics of total yards, etc.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: benjimill
Probably because of how mobile Nate is.

636680489979152984-180724B1G0475.JPG
 
I swear it had to be one of these trolls that had to yell to a perfect stranger on the street (me) who happened to be wearing an ISU t-shirt,"Hey, go hawks, Clowns suck!"
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron